Jump to content

Welcome to ExtremeHW

Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.

 

Registered users can: 

  • Start new topics and reply to others.
  • Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
  • Get your own profile page to customize.
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Take advantage of site exclusive features.
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.

pio

Reviewer
  • Posts

    1,595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57
  • Feedback

    0%

pio last won the day on March 9

pio had the most thanked content!

Reputation

1,704 Is Extreme

3 Followers

About pio

Gaming

  • Steam
    pioneerisloud

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

My Awards

  1. Well, its kind of interesting and probably long winded, but I'll try to keep it TLDR. I started down the "ultrawide" rabbit hole back in 2007 with PLP Eyefinity with 2x 20" Dells and a 30" Dell monitor. Absolutely loved that setup for over a decade. I tragically lost that setup........ So, I bought into the marketing hype of modern ultrawide displays, and picked up a 32:9 5120x1440 / 120Hz display. It's not the same, at all. GAMING - Fantastic (when the games work properly at ultrawide, older games have problems) Daily Use - HORRIBLE. I'm always using windowed programs anymore, I can't fullscreen videos (due to the wasted space). For actual daily use / multitasking, I absolutely hate ultrawide now. I'll take 3 monitor Eyefinity again please. Gaming is certainly easier on a single ultrawide monitor. Absolutely. Everything else is harder.
  2. This is pretty neat man. You can buy these off the shelf, but not anywhere NEAR as cool as yours is. The one I've got is just a plain white stand, and it has some plugs and dips built into it to set the controllers on and charge them. I think it has a headphones stand too on it (useless for my XBox setup). Really cool mod!
  3. I think that'll work a lot better. TY E!
  4. I figured. 10 is fine. Probably safer for people with slower internet connections for sure. Up to you, I just noticed wow.........25 pages of attachments.
  5. .............. Page 1 of 25 (243 attachments): I'm not even sure HOW you could change this, but I've seen a similar option on store front pages like ebay and newegg I believe. Is there any way to change HOW MANY attachments show up per page? Like say if there's 10 attachments per page (which is roughly what it looks like now), could we get a drop down menu to give more options? I didn't even realize I had that many dang attachments in my thread. Other very large image threads might also benefit from it too. Just a small minor add on. Otherwise, feature seems to be implemented and working perfectly so far! Thanks E!
  6. This, exactly right there, would be absolutely perfect in my museum collection build log thread. And lots of other threads too.
  7. You have unsupported RAM installed from the looks of it, hence it defaulting to 1333. You have "DDR3 LRDIMM 1866" memory. Your CPU, being Piledriver, is about the best you can get that generation, and yes it does support 1866, but it requires the RAM to be of "UDDR3-1866 or RDDR3-1866" type. Because you have low voltage RAM (1.50v / "LRDIMM"), its being recognized as "ULV RDDR3-1333". This is my guess, I could be wrong. But its definitely defaulting to the "ULV RDDR3-1333" timings and speeds. Is the RAM on the QVL for the board as 1866? Server parts tend to be a tad more picky about these things than desktops.
  8. Isn't 933MHz clock speed = to DDR3-1866?
  9. The GRE should in theory, be capable of doing RT titles as well as any other 7900 series card I'd think. They're all Navi 31 cards afterall. It's a tad cut down in terms of shaders and all that jazz, sure. But its still a full fat Navi 31. I'm not sure which portion of the card is responsible for the RT performance on the 7900 series cards, but its not cut down THAT badly. With that said, yes Nvidia cards are doing RT better. We all know that. At 5120x1440 / 120Hz, I have zero complaints about the RT performance on my 7900xtx though. It could be better, yes. But I knew RT was a bonus when buying this card, and it does the job well enough with FSR / frame scaling. Last gen's AMD cards were an absolute joke with RT performance. At least the 7900 series are capable of PLAYING the titles with RT enabled. I want to say the 7900 xtx is approximately on par with a 3090 or so in RT performance? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the performance really isn't bad for RT titles.
  10. I tend to agree with Pookie here on this one. Some of those topics, like the clear CMOS one, are definitely a tad generic and are probably going to get lost on google results. I could give a how to on how to give a case a fresh coat of beige. That help anybody?
  11. I'd like to submit a petition to perhaps change this to a general 7900 club? There's only two 7900GRE's on site I believe so far...... Up to you of course, not my club.
  12. Cover your butt, yeah I get it. Nah, you're telling the truth and I know it lol. I just find it HILARIOUS that this happens every single foldathon. Keep being busy. It's working!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This Website may place and access certain Cookies on your computer. ExtremeHW uses Cookies to improve your experience of using the Website and to improve our range of products and services. ExtremeHW has carefully chosen these Cookies and has taken steps to ensure that your privacy is protected and respected at all times. All Cookies used by this Website are used in accordance with current UK and EU Cookie Law. For more information please see our Privacy Policy