Snakecharmed

The first place my mind goes now with battery powered tools is whether there's a version that uses Milwaukee M18 batteries. Of course there is. Amazon.com WWW.AMAZON.COM

While the average absolute difference column is technically correct, I wonder if removing the word "absolute" in the column header and just putting minus signs in front of the percentage values would be more intuitive to the viewer. Whether the flagship baseline is 100% or 0%, a worse performer should not show a numerically higher value.

Great work. I think we all intuitively knew that -80 cards have been getting pushed further downmarket (performance-wise, because they're still insane price-wise) compared to the generation's flagship, but to see it quantified like this really hammers it home. The upsetting part is that there's nothing to fill the widening gap between the -90 and -80, so the only option is to get a used -90 from the previous generation.

For ad blocking, I've found uBlock Origin to be better than any browser's built-in blocker. On the Gecko (Firefox) side, I've read good things about Floorp for UI customization and Zen for being the most lightweight (with the caveat that it strictly uses vertical tabs). I might give Floorp a spin to potentially replace Waterfox. Librewolf is the most popular privacy-oriented Firefox fork and it also comes with uBlock Origin built-in. However, all the other privacy-conscious features in Librewolf may cause some websites to break. I tried Basilisk and Pale Moon a few years ago, and I had issues with both of them missing some functionality that I couldn't use either as a primary browser, but maybe that's changed. What I also remember is that their rendering engine was forked from Gecko so they were more prone to CSS rendering quirks on select websites. On the Chromium side, Vivaldi was refactored last year to run much faster and as someone who has been using it since before the refactor, it's a noticeable improvement. It's the fastest of my three browsers now. However, it's also feature-rich in terms of UI customization options. You don't have to configure any of it, but there's a lot you can customize in terms of tab positioning, tab grouping, tab tiling (split screen view), sidebars, etc. I've also used Brave for a few years now, and while it was a big improvement over Chrome on my work laptop at my previous job, it's never been more than a private browsing tool for my personal use, and it's slower than it used to be. Combined with the loading speed enhancements to Vivaldi, Brave got pushed back to third place in my pecking order. It seems that all they keep doing for feature updates is enhancing their crypto wallet/token features. Even though it's by all means a more decent product than Chrome these days, I've never taken Edge seriously because as a former web designer, I'm still salty about Internet Explorer's reign of terror on the web and don't care for Microsoft's business practices around their browsers in general. Finally, I tried Opera a few years ago before I settled on Vivaldi as my Chromium-based browser. It wasn't anything remarkable. I didn't know at the time that the team that was responsible for the old pre-Chromium Opera moved to Vivaldi.

What is it that you're looking for in a browser? Most Chromium-based browsers really only fundamentally share the Blink rendering engine which is necessary because the web has begun to turn back toward browser-specific coding like the Internet Explorer days. Beyond that, the browser will leverage the extensions/add-ons ecosystem of either Chrome or Firefox. I daily drive Waterfox (heavily customized with userChrome customizations) and Vivaldi, and using either is nothing like stock Firefox and Chrome respectively.

As a Waterfox, Vivaldi, and Brave user, good. Chrome sucks in general and the web is unusable without uBO.

I started putting this together in my post in the recent purchase thread, but I decided to move it here. I've benchmarked my storage devices, including HDDs, SSDs, and SD cards since 2015 (and RAM since 2011) in CrystalDiskMark and saved the screenshots of the results. This is basically comparing higher-end HDDs, SSDs, and RAM disks from 2011 to now. The CrystalDiskMark tests changed from the older to the newer versions, so the only test results that are directly comparable are sequential reads and writes (first row). I recently installed an 18 TB Seagate IronWolf Pro HDD for my main storage drive with the following results: They aren't SSDs, but large capacity hard drives still perform respectably for storing lots of data. Just don't ever boot from them so you avoid the massive performance penalties for random reads. Mid-200s for sequential isn't bad for a non-system load. I remember back around 2010, hard drives would top out at around 110 MB/s sequential and the WD Raptors would top out at around 150-160. This was my oldest HDD benchmark in CrystalDiskMark on my 1.5 TB Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 from 2015: When I built my Sandy Bridge system in 2011, I was one of the earlier adopters of SSDs as boot drives. It was still relatively new at the time that there was an SSD users club thread on OCN. Personally, I thought it was ridiculous that anyone could still defend HDDs as boot drives even back then, as if it was just okay that it took 3+ minutes for their PC to go from POST to a usable Windows desktop after the HDD stopped thrashing. There were some fervent holdouts though. To me, it wasn't even about storage capacity/cost ratio because I've had multiple drives in my system for almost as long as I can remember. It was about a life-changing experience as far as using PCs were concerned. This was my first SSD, a 128 GB Crucial m4: Curiously enough, I never benched my current primary SSD until now, 1.5 years after installing it. This is the 1 TB WD_BLACK SN850X PCIe 4.0 x4 SSD benched right now under partial write loads because I don't really care about having a clean benchmark for this post. The read performance is pretty much on target (7300 MB/s) and even under load, the writes aren't exceedingly far from the rated sequential write performance (6300 MB/s): I've also used RAM disks since the Sandy Bridge build as well, mostly for Photoshop scratch disks and temporary manual file copies of junk files I don't intend to keep. I started with Dataram RAMDisk on 16 GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3-1600 in 2011: Changing the software from Dataram RAMDisk to SoftPerfect RAM Disk made a massive improvement with the exact same RAM. At this point, I increased my RAM disk size from 4 to 8 GB to serve as a before/after comparison of upgrading from 16 GB Corsair Vengeance to 32 GB Crucial Ballistix (both DDR3-1600 kits performed similarly). Anyway, this is my last benchmark of the Corsair in 2014 using SoftPerfect instead of Dataram: And my current 64 GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 with SoftPerfect last year:

I should have taken a picture like last time. Looks like it's been a little over a year since I went from 12 to 14 TB, but I upgraded my hard drive from a 14 TB Seagate BarraCuda Pro to an 18 TB Seagate IronWolf Pro that I got for $160 factory recertified and then applied a $10 coupon to bring it down to $150. I do a fair amount of photo/video editing and usually keep the raw source files because I can. I also keep the old drive as a physical backup dating back to the drive swap date and have it around until I buy the next drive. I secure erase and sell off any older drives, so I have a 10 TB and a 12 TB drive that I'll be selling off soon. This is my first IronWolf Pro drive and it's surprisingly quiet. I was worried about it approaching Seagate Exos or HGST Ultrastar noise levels, but it's perfectly acceptable at arm's length away from my ear, no louder than the BarraCuda Pro at idle, and even quieter at seek. I also needed to buy a new USB-SATA dock because my old dock apparently maxes out at 16 TB because it would not read the new 18 TB drive at all. With the new dock, I somehow managed to not fully seat the USB 3.0 cable into the port on the motherboard back panel, so the entire file copy was done over USB 2.0 fallback. What should have been an approximately 11-12 hour operation took 70 hours. This is how the new drive performs over SATA. USB 3.0 via the dock measured similarly after I properly reseated the cable. It maxed out at 40 MB/s sequential with the loose cable.

How you feel about each artist's situation versus their body of work is entirely up to you. I've never truly had to deal with this because I don't especially care for any of the acts that have been mentioned in this thread. In some cases, I dislike some of the artists you mentioned like Diddy and Cosby for their role in their respective industry and never cared for their artistic work in the first place. However, a lot of people don't care about this seeing as how Chris Brown's fan base didn't crater after what he did to Rihanna. I have only one Michael Jackson song in my playlist of nearly 4000 songs, and I hardly ever hear it anymore because the odds are against it being played, and it's nowhere close to one of my favorites anyway. I have no desire to play it on repeat or otherwise feature it more prominently than it is. That leads me to the next point. There are too many artists and acts out there to explore, so unless one of them has performed an all-time favorite song or something like that, they're naturally going to fall out of favor over time anyway. If bad news about them comes out later, I'll be less inclined to revisit the old catalog, but I'll have already moved on to a new artist who conveniently doesn't have that baggage and we can either start the cycle all over again, or more likely not, because most people aren't garbage humans like Diddy, Cosby, or Ian Watkins. There are only two celebrities I can think of where this internal dilemma ever remotely crossed my mind. The first was Aziz Ansari, but even then, I wasn't a massive fan of his, and nonetheless, the scrutiny he faced was the Weekly World News of the #MeToo movement, written by a total hack of a reporter with no journalistic integrity. Aziz was an awkward date, not a Louis CK, and nowhere in the same universe as a Harvey Weinstein. The second is Will Smith. Before the slap though, he did enough other crap over the years to make me lose respect for him. While I don't actively seek old episodes of Fresh Prince, there are some iconic moments from that show that don't go away even though I think he's been a spineless tool in the years after The Pursuit of Happyness and I Am Legend. How often do I go out of my way to re-watch old TV shows and movies though? Practically never, so it's a moot point. There's too much media out there to roll with any particular entertainer for life. I've dropped bands for lesser, non-felonious reasons, and each time I ended up discovering something I enjoy more that I probably wouldn't have found otherwise because there's a finite amount of time in life to enjoy a virtually infinite catalog of entertainment. It doesn't have to be an active endeavor to seek out a replacement for your listening or watching time either. It just happens.

Thanks for everything you've done to build the EHW community, E. I appreciate the time and dedication you've put in to making this place what it is, and wish you the best going forward.

Nobody really cares about this CPU anymore, but I found this both funny and sad. The new 7600X3D at $300 performs better in games than the $380 7900X3D. The 7900X3D was a compromise chip that leaves both the gaming and productivity camps underwhelmed, all for more money than either a 7600X3D or a 7900X. AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D Beats Ryzen 7 9700X "Zen 5" at Gaming WWW.TECHPOWERUP.COM With German retailer Mindfactory.de listing the Ryzen 5 7600X3D, European hardware reviewers are beginning to put the chip through its... Ryzen 5 7600X3D im Test: AMD hat einen neuen Effizienzmeister! WWW.PCGAMESHARDWARE.DE PCGH hat den AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D getestet. Was der kleine Bruder des 7800X3D leistet und wie effizient die CPU dabei ist, hat uns sehr...

I've read rumors that the 9000 X3D chips may bring something different to the table this generation. I'm not sure what that would be, but the obvious candidates would be more, faster, or dual-CCD 3D cache. They're in a situation where they pretty much have to bring something different to the table or else this generation really is the AMD Raptor Lake refresh.

Since it doesn't outperform the Phantom Spirit 120 SE, it's kind of a lame duck. Perhaps the 140mm fan can push a little more air over the VRMs, but it doesn't really do anything else better and it has a bigger footprint. I ditched the stock Thermalright fans on my Peerless Assassin 120 SE from day zero. It's all about using their heatsink. Even with a pair of premium fans, you'll make out way cheaper than a Noctua NH-D15 G2 and land somewhere between a stock Thermalright and an NH-D15 in noise and cooling performance.

Someone made a comment buried in the depths of the video comments that an AMD rep said on a podcast that these 24H2 kernel updates would be coming to Windows 10 as well. I didn't check the podcast to verify it myself. However, Windows 10 is faster than Windows 11 for gaming right now. HUB tested this three weeks ago. None of this does anything to help Zen 5 on its own though. Zen 4 gets a similarly significant boost. Their performance in Windows 11 24H2 might even finally catch up to 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021 now.

Blokada 5 on Android, although I may switch to sideloading the AdGuard APK at some point. ReVanced for YouTube and whatever other apps it supports if I ever install those in the future. I don't believe in relying on apps available in the Play Store to deal with ad blocking. That's the last place I would go to find ad blocking solutions, and mobile web versions of popular apps are generally decontented.

The problem is that the damage is already done. This is why rushed product releases do more harm than good. AMD No Man's Skyed themselves. Also, if the Moore's Law is Dead leak is true that the Zen 2 team that got put in charge of Zen 5 worked off of their old codebase rather than Zen 4's, there are some bigger idiots in that company than I thought.

I think the 5950X and 7950X comparison is a total system comparison which favors the 7950X disproportionately, but even when thinking of other generational changes within the same platform such as Zen 2 to Zen 3, or even Zen to Zen+, they all represent a bigger uplift than Zen 4 to Zen 5. As it is now, Zen 5 is as meaningful in performance as the Raptor Lake refresh. That's not where AMD needs to be right now considering they still haven't overtaken the Intel 14th gen counterparts in all workloads with Zen 5. Intel handed this generation to AMD on a silver platter with their operational negligence and perhaps unsurprisingly, AMD completely fumbled it. I've seen speculation that something is very wrong with scheduling in Windows because Zen 5 does seem to be consistently stronger than Zen 4 by double-digit percentages in Linux.

9950X reviews are out today. One thing of note that I am very displeased with is the stupid requirement for Microsoft Game Bar on the 9950X and 9900X. Why the heck is core parking for gaming necessary with this CPU when it wasn't with the 7950X and 7900X? I have IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021 partly because I don't want that extra garbage in my Windows installation. It can stay out. Looks like the only upgrade path for me on AM5 if I don't want to keep yelling at a cloud is a used 7950X. The 7800X3D isn't viable because I haven't had the time to play a real game in the last year and a half that I've had this AM5 build, but I have done a fair amount of production work. And from Hardware Unboxed, to illustrate what a pathetic generational uplift the 9950X is over the 7950X, this is a reminder of what the 7950X accomplished over the 5950X:

I should clarify that I don't mean a willful or intentional laziness, but more that this isn't a choice that most users care to spend time and energy on these days. As consumers, we chose this some time ago and allowed unchecked momentum to build with the new leader out of convenience. Search isn't a choice anymore like AltaVista, Yahoo, Lycos, HotBot, Excite, or Ask Jeeves was. Google seized on the opportunity of being better than the competition at the time and they built an entire ecosystem around the search engine. Once that was established, despite whatever missteps they made with peripheral projects like Google+, they could roll up everything into the search: Google Reviews, Maps, News, Calculator, and scraping data to starve content creation platforms except for Reddit. In turn, they helped bury or squeeze out Kudzu, Yelp, MapQuest, and others, and now it's a feedback loop whether it's search or consumer services. People use Google because the competition is weak, but Google also leverages their platform to weaken their competitors. Yahoo's the only platform that has come remotely close to assembling an ecosystem like Google, but what's left of it today is paltry and it's really on the strength of only a couple of assets that aren't as tightly integrated: Sports (including fantasy sports) and Finance. The problem is their search is an afterthought. Also, their timing was never right to have made anything out of the IoT era. You could argue that they've had awful or at least underqualified leadership between Jerry Yang and Jim Lanzone. The brand only has strength in Japan, and that's because it's a separate business entity. Everything else that has any kind of minor mindshare in the search engine space today is a niche or operating in an adversarial market: DuckDuckGo (privacy), Bing (propped up by Microsoft/Edge), Yandex (RU), Baidu (CN).

There are a number of similarities in a rotten company culture not focused on product and engineering between Boeing and Intel. It's just that Intel's missteps don't come with a death toll and they haven't undergone a serious divestment of their business units yet. Their hubris led them to litigate and market their way to the top, but they don't know how to act when they get punched in the face. Breaking the Spell: Social Experiment - Intel WWW.GAMEREACTOR.EU Breaking the Spell: Social Experiment - Intel video https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/794505/core-truths-how-the-latest-technology-is-not-always-what-it-seems.html

I'm still trying to get over what an utterly stupid codename "Beast Lake" is.

By that, I think they mean most users are exceedingly lazy and trust the household brand name by default, even when said brand name recommends glue as a pizza topping and rocks as part of a balanced diet because they scrape Reddit and the Onion for data to keep users on their search results page. Google AI search tells users to glue pizza and eat rocks WWW.BBC.COM Google has defended the answers given by AI Overview, describing them as "isolated examples". Google search is very versatile, but it isn't so unbelievably good at search more than it ensures that other search engines will never gain the traction to compete. I can still put together search strings in Google that yield useless results because the subject matter is too esoteric and they can't rely on scraping subreddits for everything. The devious and harmful part of what they do is finding ways to keep users on their search results pages regardless of the search query, even at the expense of taking away traffic from the actual content creators.

Going back in time to the aughts, there was always a forum involved in terms of my active participation. I went from PCPer when I had my Athlon XP-M build to OCN when I had the Sandy Bridge build, and then of course here after the VS BS. For industry news, AnandTech and Tom's Hardware were the OG news sites for me. There were also a few others I kept in the periphery when it came to hardware reviews, like Guru3D and TechPowerUp. I also browsed the OCN news section before the VS XenForo fiasco. Nowadays it's VideoCardz and Tom's when I care to look up the news, but usually, GamersNexus news recap videos serve as my entry point in my YouTube subscriptions, which I then use to branch off to Hardware Unboxed, der8auer, and JayzTwoCents. I can't watch LTT anymore after Linus's antics and LMG's various acts of bad business buffoonery in recent years. GN also led me to Louis Rossmann, whose advocacy for right-to-repair and right-to-own have been sobering for staying on top of underhanded anti-consumer trends in the industry. I ended up reading a bunch of Reddit threads for information when I was dealing with the coil whine issues on this motherboard last year, but I don't care much for the community of any subreddits. There's an absence of critical thinking skills throughout that site. All I can say about the discourse there is at least it's not the Wccftech comments section.

I'm glad GN is holding Intel's feet to the fire. Intel's statements were very weak.

I'm guessing it's a script not loading correctly that's badly screwing up the page layout. The page looks blank but it's really just stretched. I took a scrolling screenshot of the issue. It goes away after a refresh.