Jump to content

Welcome to ExtremeHW

Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.

 

Registered users can: 

  • Start new topics and reply to others.
  • Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
  • Get your own profile page to customize.
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Take advantage of site exclusive features.
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.
IGNORED

AMD: 7800X3D up to 24% faster than Intel


Recommended Posts

Quote

AMD has released official gaming benchmark results for its upcoming 8-core Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor, which is set to launch in April. The benchmark shows that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Intel's Core i9-13900K by up to 24%.

 

Source: Guru3D

 

 

 

untitled-1.jpg

876ty.png

fgfd.png

 

1080p gamers rejoice! 

Edited by UltraMega
  • Thanks 3
  • Respect 1

Owned

 Share

CPU: 5800x
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS TUF Gaming B550-Plus
RAM: XMP 3600mhz CL16
GPU: 7900XT
SOUNDCARD: Sound Blaster Z 5.1 home theater
MONITOR: 4K 65 inch TV
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.4k 822

The sad thing is all of those game are at 200+ fps on a 13900k 🙁

Horizon is singlethreaded was using 20-40% of one of my 13900k core probably e core not even p core.

 

Wonder how future game will perform. Still a great cpu power comsumption probably insane low 😎

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb Gskill 6400 cl36-48-48 1.4v
PSU: Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold White Edition
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: CoolerMaster NR200P White Mini ITX
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Asus Strix G15 AE 6800m 5900hx 32gb ram 1440p
RAM: MSI GT60 Dominator 870m 4800MQ
GPU: Alienware M11x R2 i7 640um Nvidia 335m 8gb Ram
MONITOR: Lenovo X270 1080p i7 7600u 16gb ram
SSD/NVME: Acer Chromebook 11.6
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 5560u
MOTHERBOARD: Beelink SER5 Mini PC Box
RAM: 2x32gb Sodimm
CASE: Jonsbo N1 Mini ITX
HDD: 8TB + 4TB HDD + 2 x Intel DC S3500 800GB
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say AMD is sandbagging pretty hard by waiting till April to launch this, but guess that's how they push more 7900X3D and 7950X3D on gamers who don't need them.

 

7800X3D should be a a monster, plus no scheduling issues like its bigger counterparts.

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 14-8-14-14-21-35 1T GDM)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: Corsair RM1000x
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K, Core i9-10900K, Core i3-13100, Core i9-13900KS
GPU: various
RAM: Corsair 32GB DDR3-2400 | Oloy Blade 16GB DDR4-3600 | Crucial 16GB DDR5-5600
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Deluxe | EVGA Z490 Dark | EVGA Z790 Dark Kingpin
SSD/NVME: Samsung 870 Evo 1TB | Inland 1TB Gen 4
PSU: BeQuiet Straight Power 12 1500W
CASE: Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 - bench mode
OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows 10 LTSC
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: M1 Pro
RAM: 32GB
SSD/NVME: 1TB
OPERATING SYSTEM: MacOS Sonoma
CASE: Space Grey
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.4k 822
7 hours ago, mouacyk said:

Bring it on. VR really needs these levels of performance.  Also, OLED motion clarity at 240Hz demands it.

Only issue for VR is we need a 10999 RTX Dual die gpu 😁  8k per eye 😅

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb Gskill 6400 cl36-48-48 1.4v
PSU: Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold White Edition
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: CoolerMaster NR200P White Mini ITX
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Asus Strix G15 AE 6800m 5900hx 32gb ram 1440p
RAM: MSI GT60 Dominator 870m 4800MQ
GPU: Alienware M11x R2 i7 640um Nvidia 335m 8gb Ram
MONITOR: Lenovo X270 1080p i7 7600u 16gb ram
SSD/NVME: Acer Chromebook 11.6
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 5560u
MOTHERBOARD: Beelink SER5 Mini PC Box
RAM: 2x32gb Sodimm
CASE: Jonsbo N1 Mini ITX
HDD: 8TB + 4TB HDD + 2 x Intel DC S3500 800GB
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, bonami2 said:

Only issue for VR is we need a 10999 RTX Dual die gpu 😁  8k per eye 😅

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

Edited by mouacyk
  • Respect 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.4k 822
8 hours ago, mouacyk said:

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

At a point i see 35% cpu usage 13900k and 48% 7950x3d that where you see that the 13900k is a monster. Low are pretty close but the 13900k as worse minimum fps. 

We need multithreading optimisation the 7950x3d just show how most game are not really well optimised.

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb Gskill 6400 cl36-48-48 1.4v
PSU: Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold White Edition
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: CoolerMaster NR200P White Mini ITX
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Asus Strix G15 AE 6800m 5900hx 32gb ram 1440p
RAM: MSI GT60 Dominator 870m 4800MQ
GPU: Alienware M11x R2 i7 640um Nvidia 335m 8gb Ram
MONITOR: Lenovo X270 1080p i7 7600u 16gb ram
SSD/NVME: Acer Chromebook 11.6
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 5560u
MOTHERBOARD: Beelink SER5 Mini PC Box
RAM: 2x32gb Sodimm
CASE: Jonsbo N1 Mini ITX
HDD: 8TB + 4TB HDD + 2 x Intel DC S3500 800GB
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/03/2023 at 12:35, mouacyk said:

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

There's a reason reviewers don't show 4k results in CPU reviews. It's because if you're testing CPUs, you need to create a bottleneck for that part. Running at 4k is largely pointless solely due to how it's 100% a GPU bottleneck, as showcased here. Yes, there is some variance, but the difference is notably larger at 1440p and 1080p, where you'd want to use these parts.

 

I personally find the 7000X3D parts a little lackluster if only because the 5800X3D is so good. I can see why AMD didn't launch a 16-core X3D part with Ryzen 5000. It'd have completely invalidated Zen 4 across the board. xD 

$2000~

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MOTHERBOARD: ASRock B550M Steel Legend
GPU: Radeon 12GB RX 6700XT
RAM: 64GB G.Skill DDR4 3200 CL16
SSD/NVME: 512GB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 4) NVMe
SSD/NVME 2: 1TB WD Black (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 3: 2TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 4: 2TB Samsung EVO (SATA)
Full Rig Info

$900

Owned

 Share

CPU: Intel Core i7-10875H (8C/16T @ 45w)
MOTHERBOARD: "Comet Lake" HM470 Chipset
RAM: 32GB TeamGroup DDR4 2933
GPU: 8GB Nvidia RTX 2070 (130w)
SSD/NVME: 1TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3)
SSD/NVME 2: 2TB Silicon Power A80 (Gen 3)
MONITOR: 17.3" 1920x1080 @ 144Hz
PSU: Chicony 240 Power Brick
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Imglidinhere said:

There's a reason reviewers don't show 4k results in CPU reviews. It's because if you're testing CPUs, you need to create a bottleneck for that part. Running at 4k is largely pointless solely due to how it's 100% a GPU bottleneck, as showcased here. Yes, there is some variance, but the difference is notably larger at 1440p and 1080p, where you'd want to use these parts.

 

I personally find the 7000X3D parts a little lackluster if only because the 5800X3D is so good. I can see why AMD didn't launch a 16-core X3D part with Ryzen 5000. It'd have completely invalidated Zen 4 across the board. xD 

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

Edited by Sir Beregond
  • Thanks 1

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 14-8-14-14-21-35 1T GDM)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: Corsair RM1000x
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K, Core i9-10900K, Core i3-13100, Core i9-13900KS
GPU: various
RAM: Corsair 32GB DDR3-2400 | Oloy Blade 16GB DDR4-3600 | Crucial 16GB DDR5-5600
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Deluxe | EVGA Z490 Dark | EVGA Z790 Dark Kingpin
SSD/NVME: Samsung 870 Evo 1TB | Inland 1TB Gen 4
PSU: BeQuiet Straight Power 12 1500W
CASE: Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 - bench mode
OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows 10 LTSC
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: M1 Pro
RAM: 32GB
SSD/NVME: 1TB
OPERATING SYSTEM: MacOS Sonoma
CASE: Space Grey
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premium Platinum - Lifetime
1.2k 765

Having the 7900x3d myself, and playing at 3440x1440p 144hz, and having an 4090, the R9 5900x was bottlenecking me.

 

I really only play Forza Horizon 4 and 5 and here's the result:

 

168 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 5900x

192 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 7900x3d

195 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 7900x3d with cas 30 6200MHz RAM

 

I'm happy. About the cross CCD latency penalties and the like, if you install the correct chipset drivers with x3d optimizations, and set Windows power plan to Ryzen Balanced, then when the system detects a gaming load it will park cores in the non-V-Cache CCD to enable the V-Cache CCD to only run the load while idling the other. I'm satisfied with my purchase even if it probably is slower than a 13900k or ks, especially if they are running DDR5-7000+.

  • Thanks 2

$5500

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 9 7900X3D 2100MHz fclk
RAM: G.skill TridentZ5 7600MHz 36-45-45-45 1.425v
GPU: MSI RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio 3.135GHz/12.152GHz
MOTHERBOARD: Asus ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming Wifi
SSD/NVME: Crucial T700 1TB Gen 5 M.2
MONITOR: Acer Ultrawide Curved 3440x1440 144Hz HDR400 FreeSync
CASE: anidees Ai Crystal AR3 Midtower
CPU COOLER: EK Nucleus AIO CR360 Dark w/ PTM7950
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: i5-7600 4.5GHz
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS ROG Strix Z270H Gaming
RAM: G.skill DDR4-3000 15-16-16
CASE: Silverstone Grandia series GD09
GPU: GT 710
SSD/NVME: Samsung 850 Evo
MONITOR: Asus V239H 1080p 60Hz IPS
CPU COOLER: Thermalright AXP-120-X67
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Beregond said:

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

 

I agree on both issues. 4K is becoming more widely used, and apart from minimum FPS, there are games and sims when at least a RTX 4090 (and presumably subsequent models such as 4090 Ti/ Titan Ada) can get bottle-necked at 4K by the CPU. What is more, DLSS3/FrameIns/NVReflex also impact heavily at 4K (in a positive way).

 

As to 7800X3D (and even the older 5800X3D), it clearly is the gamer's choice. For folks like myself who are using these things for productivity, the 7950X3D makes more sense, not least as you can set it to 'just' be a 7800X3D but still retain the full 32 threads when needed for productivity. 

 

 

Edited by J7SC_Orion
  • Thanks 2

Owned

 Share

CPU: CPU: ><.......7950X3D - Aorus X670E Master - 48GB DDR5 7200 (8000) TridentZ SK Hynix - Giga-G-OC/Galax RTX 4090 670W - LG 48 OLED - 4TB NVMEs >< .......5950X - Asus CH 8 Dark Hero - 32GB CL13 DDR4 4000 - AMD R 6900XT 500W - Philips BDM40 4K VA - 2TB NVME & 3TB SSDs >> - <<.......4.4 TR 2950X - MSI X399 Creation - 32 GB CL 14 3866 - Asus RTX 3090 Strix OC/KPin 520W and 2x RTX 2080 Ti Gigabyte XTR WF WB 380W - LG 55 IPS HDR - 1TB NVME & 4TB SSDs
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/03/2023 at 13:38, Sir Beregond said:

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

I'm not so sure we really need to increase core count. If the rumored 30% IPC uplift actually happens with Zen 5, that alone will improve multicore performance by something to the tune of 50-60% at minimum.

 

I am tempering my expectations with Zen 5, even though Zen 4 was already beyond my expectations across the board in every regard. Here's to hoping AMD can keep up the momentum.

Edited by Imglidinhere
  • Respect 2

$2000~

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MOTHERBOARD: ASRock B550M Steel Legend
GPU: Radeon 12GB RX 6700XT
RAM: 64GB G.Skill DDR4 3200 CL16
SSD/NVME: 512GB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 4) NVMe
SSD/NVME 2: 1TB WD Black (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 3: 2TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 4: 2TB Samsung EVO (SATA)
Full Rig Info

$900

Owned

 Share

CPU: Intel Core i7-10875H (8C/16T @ 45w)
MOTHERBOARD: "Comet Lake" HM470 Chipset
RAM: 32GB TeamGroup DDR4 2933
GPU: 8GB Nvidia RTX 2070 (130w)
SSD/NVME: 1TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3)
SSD/NVME 2: 2TB Silicon Power A80 (Gen 3)
MONITOR: 17.3" 1920x1080 @ 144Hz
PSU: Chicony 240 Power Brick
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Imglidinhere said:

I'm not so sure we really need to increase core count. If the rumored 30% IPC uplift actually happens with Zen 5, that alone will improve multicore performance by something to the tune of 50-60% at minimum.

 

I am tempering my expectations with Zen 5, even though Zen 4 was already beyond my expectations across the board in every regard. Here's to hoping AMD can keep up the momentum.

Yeah I agree. Just wondering the next logical architectural change for Ryzen. I could see a push for more core count given the lack of really continuing to support Threadripper platforms.

 

As for how good Zen 5 is, probably depends on where we land with TSMC 3nm.

  • Respect 1

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 14-8-14-14-21-35 1T GDM)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: Corsair RM1000x
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K, Core i9-10900K, Core i3-13100, Core i9-13900KS
GPU: various
RAM: Corsair 32GB DDR3-2400 | Oloy Blade 16GB DDR4-3600 | Crucial 16GB DDR5-5600
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Deluxe | EVGA Z490 Dark | EVGA Z790 Dark Kingpin
SSD/NVME: Samsung 870 Evo 1TB | Inland 1TB Gen 4
PSU: BeQuiet Straight Power 12 1500W
CASE: Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 - bench mode
OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows 10 LTSC
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: M1 Pro
RAM: 32GB
SSD/NVME: 1TB
OPERATING SYSTEM: MacOS Sonoma
CASE: Space Grey
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This Website may place and access certain Cookies on your computer. ExtremeHW uses Cookies to improve your experience of using the Website and to improve our range of products and services. ExtremeHW has carefully chosen these Cookies and has taken steps to ensure that your privacy is protected and respected at all times. All Cookies used by this Website are used in accordance with current UK and EU Cookie Law. For more information please see our Privacy Policy