Jump to content

Welcome to ExtremeHW

Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.

 

Registered users can: 

  • Start new topics and reply to others.
  • Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
  • Get your own profile page to customize.
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Take advantage of site exclusive features.
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.
IGNORED

Are More RAM Modules Better for Gaming? 4 x 4GB vs. 2 x 8GB - TechSpot


Recommended Posts

Interesting indeed, thought it's not something I've considered too much before. Results in charts are a big greater than I would expect, but based on their conclusions in the last few paragraphs what with all of the variables involved in a real world scenario, I take it the difference is largely negligible, or at least inconsistent across each individual case?

3685.29

Owned

 Share

CPU: [AMD] Ryzen 9 3900X
CPU COOLER: [Cooler Master] MasterLiquid ML360R
MOTHERBOARD: [Asus] ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
RAM: [G.Skill] Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600
SSD/NVME: [Western Digital] Black 512 GB NVMe SSD
SSD/NVME 2: [Team] 4x 1 TB 2.5" SSD
HDD: [Western Digital] Black Series 3 TB HDD
GPU: [EVGA] RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Supercrumpet said:
Interesting indeed, thought it's not something I've considered too much before. Results in charts are a big greater than I would expect, but based on their conclusions in the last few paragraphs what with all of the variables involved in a real world scenario, I take it the difference is largely negligible, or at least inconsistent across each individual case?

 

If I understand U correctly,the results were consistent for each game tested,BUT different games had different results.I would guess that had to do with the way the different game engines were designed to use memory. What I would have liked to see was a further set of test @ say 720 to see if the % went up with the games being more cpu/memory bound with even less call on the gpu.:eat_popcom:Edit: Some of the results shown were of test using Vulcan and DX11 in place of DX12

 

Edited by schuck6566
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  schuck6566 said:

 

If I understand U correctly,the results were consistent for each game tested,BUT different games had different results.I would guess that had to do with the way the different game engines were designed to use memory. What I would have liked to see was a further set of test @ say 720 to see if the % went up with the games being more cpu/memory bound with even less call on the gpu.:eat_popcom:Edit: Some of the results shown were of test using Vulcan and DX11 in place of DX12

 

Yeah I'm pretty much saying that I find it interesting that more modules generally provides more performance, but it's not much, and yes, like you said, it varies from game to game. In practice though, especially with 1440p, ultrawide, and other higher resolutions becoming increasingly popular, I think this difference would be smaller in most cases since you would be more GPU bound.

3685.29

Owned

 Share

CPU: [AMD] Ryzen 9 3900X
CPU COOLER: [Cooler Master] MasterLiquid ML360R
MOTHERBOARD: [Asus] ROG Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
RAM: [G.Skill] Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600
SSD/NVME: [Western Digital] Black 512 GB NVMe SSD
SSD/NVME 2: [Team] 4x 1 TB 2.5" SSD
HDD: [Western Digital] Black Series 3 TB HDD
GPU: [EVGA] RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'm seeing is that things are becoming more like calculus and the old days were more like algebra. Everything is inter-related. Actually makes things more interesting for enthusiasts as there might be more opportunity for performance improvement that hasn't been capitalized on by companies yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good read. The funny thing is I have always made the assumption more module = better, not necessarily for Overclocking mind you but for me logically thinking I assume that a certain degree of load balancing came into it when thinking about the 2x modules vs 4x modules.

£3000

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
MOTHERBOARD: MSI Meg Ace X670E
RAM: Corsair Dominator Titanium 64GB (6000MT/s)
GPU: EVGA 3090 FTW Ultra Gaming
SSD/NVME: Corsair MP700 Pro SE Gen 5 4TB
PSU: EVGA Supernova T2 1600Watt
CASE: be quiet Dark Base Pro 900 Rev 2
FANS: Noctua NF-A14 industrialPPC x 6
Full Rig Info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.6k 881

Oh crap even more complicated!

 

They need to try Arma 3.

 

Was looking for a ryzen 4 build with 64gb of ram but... 3600mhz cl15 ram is expensive as hell

null

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z690 MEG ACE
CPU: Intel 13900k + 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb 8000mhz @6600 cl32
PSU: 1300w XPG Cybercore Platinum
GPU: Sapphire Nitro+ 9070 XT
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: Corsair 7000D Airflow White
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This Website may place and access certain Cookies on your computer. ExtremeHW uses Cookies to improve your experience of using the Website and to improve our range of products and services. ExtremeHW has carefully chosen these Cookies and has taken steps to ensure that your privacy is protected and respected at all times. All Cookies used by this Website are used in accordance with current UK and EU Cookie Law. For more information please see our Privacy Policy