NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 3DMark performance leaks out

[Kaz]

Their page doesn't want to copy a snippet, but the timespy and fire strike performance improvements are significant.  5090 Firestrike 4K = 33,114, while the  4090 = 24828.  The overall increase ranges from 24 - 30 % increase.  These are benchmark tools so it's likely the task is repetitive and their AI performance is on full display.  Stand by for real tests!  30% improvement is more than Nvidia likes to do!  They could be shaving performance for next gen with numbers like that!

Just a moment...

VIDEOCARDZ.COM

 

[Sir Beregond]

1 hour ago, Kaz said:

Their page doesn't want to copy a snippet, but the timespy and fire strike performance improvements are significant.  5090 Firestrike 4K = 33,114, while the  4090 = 24828.  The overall increase ranges from 24 - 30 % increase.  These are benchmark tools so it's likely the task is repetitive and their AI performance is on full display.  Stand by for real tests!  30% improvement is more than Nvidia likes to do!  They could be shaving performance for next gen with numbers like that!

Just a moment...

VIDEOCARDZ.COM

 

30% seems about right. They are both on the same process (N4) and the 5090 has approximately 32% more shaders and about 28% higher TDP than the 4090 (575W vs 450W stock). I know TDP numbers don't mean everything so will be interesting to see how these actually work out power wise in real world testing.

 

Given the much lower increase in shaders on the 5080, 5070 Ti, 5070, but still an increase in power, going to be interesting to see where those land too.