ENTERPRISE

We are possibly getting some, but a Corsair variant, that being said, I will approach MSI to see if we can get our hands on them for glorious review.

The UMA and NUMA style thinking is possibly what AMD has done. Used that same sort of Logic to put the 2nd CCD to sleep. One would imagine this is done via microcode on the BIOS which instructs the system to fully ignore the 2nd CCD. If that is the case then someone clever can modify the BIOS to wake the 2nd CCD. Now results would vary, just enabling the 2nd CCD could result in constant crash/post issues depending on how poor that CCD is. However if you are lucky, as I say you may either need to disable certain cores or down lock them. Will be interesting to see what @1usmus will find.

5.6Ghz eh, nice ! If only phase change was cheap to run 24/7

I think you need to bust out that phase change cooler again

I actually don't remember that...was a long while ago. I remember being excited about HBM... Until the price lol.

Oh man...Love Sledgehammer.

Yeah I was considering that when writing my reply, eventually there will come a point when other hardware becomes the limiting factor...remember when drives were the slowest thing in the PC...oh the days lol.

Well I think this topic has run its course, so I will go ahead and close it to avoid any heated transactions as unfortunately this type topic tends to bring out the green eyes monsters lol.

Ha, that is fair enough. I would share concerns if they had enabled cores across a 2 CCD's with one of the CCD's being of a not so stable nature. It will be interesting if there is a way of "Unlocking" the second CCD as from the article it is active but asleep so to speak. Of course if you were able to re-activate it, I would assume you would have to manually tweak that CCD to disable certain cores or lower the core clock in order to reach stability.

Worth a watch. Honest, they were a little niave but considering the scale of the project, not surprising there were issues

TSMC this year certainly are not looking for work. It would be great if Intel can be a true competitor to try and bring prices back to a better level....not to mention stock with a GPU you can actually get your hands on !

In what respect ? Just curious.

Blimey, that is nice. I wonder at what point though you start to see diminishing returns. Those are seriously fast, but would you notice it in real world load times over the other Gen 4 NVMe drives.

Sigh.... expected but you never like it confirmed.

This is the thing, I always see both sides when it comes to AMD GPU's, but taking into account the good and bad I hear it's virtually 50/50. So im usually hesitant about going over to the red team.

I remember my 4790K from Silicon Lottery. 5.2GHz on that baby. Still a solid CPU to be honest.

Fingers crossed it will stay like that in the future !

I'm thinking this was meant for the other thread

Nothing against them but remembering back I think this guy said it as I recalled it. Source:https://hardforum.com/threads/whatever-happened-to-rambus.1774714/#post-1040093286 Not a document but those were the points I recall.

I agree that putting all your eggs in one basket while at times advantageous from an infrastructure and accessibility standpoint can be great, the flip side can be very dark. However surely companies such as MS and others would have contractual agreements to ensure their own infrastructure security. I admittedly have not nosed dived into the recent parlor issues so may be missing some factors.

Source:https://videocardz.com/newz/ek-unveils-active-gpu-backplate-cooling-solution

Source:https://www-theverge-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2021/1/13/22228702/intel-ceo-bob-swan-pat-gelsinger-technical-financial?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From %1%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theverge.com%2F2021%2F1%2F13%2F22228702%2Fintel-ceo-bob-swan-pat-gelsinger-technical-financial

Source:https://www-pcgamer-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcgamer.com/uk/amp/intel-dg2-tsmc-7nm-process-node/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcgamer.com%2Fuk%2Fintel-dg2-tsmc-7nm-process-node%2F

Source:https://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/joao-silva/some-amd-ryzen-5-5600x-and-ryzen-7-5800x-cpus-come-with-two-ccds/

This is hard one to be honest. While it would be nice to have a "Democratic" internet, I'm just not sure it would work. Can you imagine the amount of regulatory oversight required to make it work. Furthermore, censorship is sort of required on the internet. As there for the most part is no way of "punishing" people for breaking rules In any meaningful way, not like in the physical world, you need the ability to censor or ban a user from a facility. That is the only way site owners can keep some form of law and order, sure it technically tramples on freedom of speech and expression...but the line has to be drawn somewhere.