Forums first comp: CPUz Benchmark

[Storm-Chaser]

On 06/03/2022 at 11:59, Pawelr98 said:

Lowest tier Alder Lake, the allmighty G6900 at stock speed with a single stick of 4GB 2400MHz DDR4 ram.

 

And then my daily driver, Core i7 6950X clocked at 4.2GHz with 2x16GB 2666MHz DDR4 ram.

 

By single core score, you can tell how much has improved over the years IPC wise.

Sorry  missed this submission, I will get u added to the leaderboard tomorrow. 

[Storm-Chaser]

Leaderboard Update

[ArchStanton]

@Storm-ChaserAppologies for adding this an hour after your update, but better late than never I guess.

 

Straight PBO2.  No dynamic OC switching or static OC.  C8DH bios 3801.  Ambient 16⁰C. 300/160/225.

 

[Storm-Chaser]

7 minutes ago, ArchStanton said:

@Storm-ChaserAppologies for adding this an hour after your update, but better late than never I guess.

 

Straight PBO2.  No dynamic OC switching or static OC.  C8DH bios 3801.  Ambient 16⁰C. 300/160/225.

 

Just had a chance to read up on project mid life crisis. Well planned and executed from what I can see! Looks good. Don't worry about the result post any time, plus I still had the excel file open, so it was no extra work. Are you going to try to catch @J7SC_Orion?? You guys are only separated by about 200pts in multicore and 4pts in single.

 

[ArchStanton]

2 minutes ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Are you going to try to catch @J7SC_Orion?? You guys are only separated by about 200pts in multicore and 4pts in single.

I wish . Even if my latter day CPU could match his, there is far too large a gap between his skills and mine.  In the interest of full disclosure, my RAM/fclock only works because I copy/pasted his settings...

[pio]

I'll go ahead and make Storm-Chaser do some extra work too, why not?

 

4.3GHz all core overclock applied, RAM and IF still at 1867 on a 1:1 ratio.  Just did manual multiplier and voltage instead of PBO.  Seems like I'm getting decent improvements overall here at 4.3GHz.

 

[Storm-Chaser]

 

1 minute ago, ArchStanton said:

I wish . Even if my latter day CPU could match his, there is far too large a gap between his skills and mine.  In the interest of full disclosure, my RAM/fclock only works because I copy/pasted his settings...

 Haha thats pretty funny! 

[Storm-Chaser]

10 minutes ago, pioneerisloud said:

I'll go ahead and make Storm-Chaser do some extra work too, why not?

 

4.3GHz all core overclock applied, RAM and IF still at 1867 on a 1:1 ratio.  Just did manual multiplier and voltage instead of PBO.  Seems like I'm getting decent improvements overall here at 4.3GHz.

 

What can I say? Im a glutton for punishment! 

 

I might institute another statistic, which would be total rig count. A number of us have multiple rigs and lots of them (on the list). just an idea. I would then take all of the averages from those individual machines and see who comes out on top. Ill crunch that in my head for the next couple days and hopefully we can come up with something. or then again it might not get off the ground. lol

 

I will get you added tonight, fyi.

 

 

[J7SC_Orion]

3 hours ago, Storm-Chaser said:

 

 Haha thats pretty funny! 

 

...if you say so... 

...currently focusing on the 3950X though; single CPUz (top left) is ready for your perusal for the table.

 

 

 

 

Edited March 12, 2022 by J7SC_Orion
updt2

[pio]

7 hours ago, Storm-Chaser said:

What can I say? Im a glutton for punishment! 

 

I might institute another statistic, which would be total rig count. A number of us have multiple rigs and lots of them (on the list). just an idea. I would then take all of the averages from those individual machines and see who comes out on top. Ill crunch that in my head for the next couple days and hopefully we can come up with something. or then again it might not get off the ground. lol

 

I will get you added tonight, fyi.

 

 

Well here's some more punishment.  Good thing you didn't add that one yet.  I found out 4.35GHz is seemingly stable on my chip!

 

That should help my dinky Ryzen 5 3600 come out a LITTLE bit ahead of where it was originally with PBO at stock!  

 

EDIT:  Yup, if I did my math right, I should be right under the two 2700x's on the list, and JUST BARELY trailing that Ryzen 5600 with a total score of 4921.8.

 

Edited March 12, 2022 by pioneerisloud

[ArchStanton]

CPU-Z bench stable only.  DOC enabled at 60A. Hysteresis 0.  1.425v set/1.306v get.  CCX0 48.75/CCX1 48.25.  233W.  71.4⁰C peak core.  16⁰C ambient.  I could not push CCX0 higher without crashing regardless of voltage (did not test above 1.475 set).  CCX1 showed performance regression above 48.25 multiplier.

 

 

Now time to get back to stability testing my "daily driver" settings.

[Avacado]

4 hours ago, ArchStanton said:

CPU-Z bench stable only.  DOC enabled at 60A. Hysteresis 0.  1.425v set/1.306v get.  CCX0 48.75/CCX1 48.25.  233W.  71.4⁰C peak core.  16⁰C ambient.  I could not push CCX0 higher without crashing regardless of voltage (did not test above 1.475 set).  CCX1 showed performance regression above 48.25 multiplier.

 

 

Now time to get back to stability testing my "daily driver" settings.

Sick multi!

[J7SC_Orion]

...back from Saturday shopping; and time to check my thumb drive 

 

5950x updated multi (single stays as-is for now)...

 

   

 

3950X updated (new single per yesterday, updated multi)

 

 

@Storm-Chaser ...the 3950X might move a spot in the table (may be, may be not )

[ArchStanton]

14 minutes ago, J7SC_Orion said:

5950x updated multi (single stays as-is for now)...

When I saw mine hit 14.2k I got really curious as to what yours is truly capable of doing.  Beautiful score man .

 

Edit: If you don't mind my asking, what was your "get" voltage at those settings?

Edited March 13, 2022 by ArchStanton

[Storm-Chaser]

15 hours ago, J7SC_Orion said:

@Storm-Chaser ...the 3950X might move a spot in the table (may be, may be not )

lol luckfully it's the weekend. That leaves with hours to update just a handful of subs. It's gonna be very close but I think I can update at least two submissions in that timeframe. haha

[Bastiaan_NL]

I should give it a try at some of the higher settings I ran during benchmarking, but 13023.4 is it for now  

 

@ArchStanton and @J7SC_Orion Those multi thread results are crazy!

Edited March 13, 2022 by Bastiaan_NL

[ArchStanton]

45 minutes ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

Those multi thread results are crazy!

The crazy part is, I am convinced he is sandbagging to be polite and only stay slightly ahead .

[Bastiaan_NL]

20 hours ago, ArchStanton said:

The crazy part is, I am convinced he is sandbagging to be polite and only stay slightly ahead .

Knowing a bit of J7's history I think you might be right. I am glad he's not in my HWBOT league, I wouldn't stand a chance...

[J7SC_Orion]

15 minutes ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

Knowing a bit of J7's history I think you might be right. I am glad he's not in my HWBOT league, I wouldn't stand a chance...

 

First, a big   for your HWBot league 1st place run ! As to my HWBot, I was in the extreme league and haven't subbed for points in many, many, many years...I do the odd 3DMark these days, but mostly, I just like to push hardware for my own purposes. 

 

As to keeping higher back-up scores on a thumb drive 'for later', that is true. But it is not s.th. special I invented; most (former and current) HWBotters do that - with all your HWBot Overclocker League golds, you might want to build one up yourself (if you haven't already done so) as folks will come gunning for your points and cups.

 

 

Edited March 14, 2022 by J7SC_Orion

[Bastiaan_NL]

Thanks J, I was just kidding about the sandbagging though
I still don't enjoy overclocking hardware as much as you seem to do, but I do enjoy the competition side of it. 

The next step of the HWBot madness is building up a database with good runs, and keeping that #1 spot. I wasn't even convinced I could grab first place (unlike @Avacado), so until that moment it was all out for gold. 

[Pawelr98]

On 09/03/2022 at 05:54, Sir Beregond said:

Think your Celeron single core beat out my 4.6GHz OC single core 4790k.

That's the power of the new architecture, those two cores have about the same performance as an old quadcore sandy i5's (matches a stock i5 2300).

 

This thing when benchmarking (cinebench) draws something like 40-42W from the wall with a 80+ Gold 300W FSP unit (230V mains). Intel Claims 46W TDP.

Asrock H610M-HDV/M2 with a Samsung PM991a 256GB NVME and 4GB 2400MHz ram, keyboard + mouse.

At the same time, idles at 16-17W.

 

Edited March 14, 2022 by Pawelr98

[Storm-Chaser]

[bonami2]

Should i order An EK watercooling kit? Dual 360mm.

 

Wonder how much voltage we can push safely on alder lake.

 

Currently folding on the cpu at stock since 1.3 5.1 4.1 is too hot

 

 

EK-Classic Kit P360 D-RGB - Black Nickel Edition - Kits - Classic – EK Webshop

WWW.EKWB.COM

---

This is a value-oriented, high-performance D-RGB liquid cooling kit that comes with many...

 

 

 

Will add some cpu soon. A n4100  fx 6100 fx 8120 sempron 145. Two athlon x2 and x4 a z8350.

 

Edited March 15, 2022 by bonami2

[Mr. Fox]

On 11/03/2022 at 23:21, J7SC_Orion said:

 

...if you say so... 

...currently focusing on the 3950X though; single CPUz (top left) is ready for your perusal for the table.

 

 

 

 

Nice Cinebench run. I like that it runs on Linux, too. Not sure how much more nonsense I can tolerate from the Redmond Reprobates.

 

[ArchStanton]

@Mr. Foxwhen you close your eyes at night, do you dream of CBR23 30K?  Great looking stuff per usual .