Jump to content

Welcome to ExtremeHW

Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.

 

Registered users can: 

  • Start new topics and reply to others.
  • Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
  • Get your own profile page to customize.
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Take advantage of site exclusive features.
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.
IGNORED

Intel Arc 3 A380 vs. AMD Radeon RX 6400


Recommended Posts

Quote

Today we're taking another look at Intel Arc 3 A380, but this time with a 51 game benchmark head to head against AMD's $150 Radeon RX 6400. This will give us a better idea of how the Arc A380 performs across a wide range of titles and -- spoiler alert -- it wasn't all smooth sailing, but there were some positive signs as well, it's a very mixed bag and we're keen to show you the results.

WWW.TECHSPOT.COM

Here's another look at the Intel Arc 3 A380 GPU, but this time on a 51 game benchmark against AMD's $150...

 

 

 

 

Screenshots_2022-08-13-08-54-54.png

 

Maybe not completely horrible start, but definitely not good. It will be interesting to see how long it takes them to clean up this driver mess. 

Edited by UltraMega

Owned

 Share

CPU: 5800x
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS TUF Gaming B550-Plus
RAM: XMP 3600mhz CL16
GPU: 7900XT
SOUNDCARD: Sound Blaster Z 5.1 home theater
MONITOR: 4K 65 inch TV
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now this is a proper comparison and review!  I still say, its looking promising. 🙂 

 

EDIT:
I do have to say, after getting myself a freesync monitor, the 1% lows are actually more important to me than averages are anymore these days.  They say the A380 is 7% slower overall than the RX6400 is at 1080p, but that's based off averages.  If you look at the 1% lows, it looks like it might be telling a different story.

Interesting to note too how BADLY the A380 actually performs on DX9 titles (CS:GO).  Intel does state the GPU is tuned more for modern API's though, and it was more than playable still.  Just interesting there. 

Edited by pioneerisloud
  • Thanks 1

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 7900x
GPU: Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX
PSU: Cooler Master 850w Platinum
CPU COOLER: Cooler Master MasterLiquid PL360 Flux
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte B650 Aorus AX
SSD/NVME: Solidigm P41 Plus 2TB Gen4 NVME
RAM: G.Skill Flare X DDR5-6000
CASE: HAF700 Berserker
Full Rig Info

Too much

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Opteron 180 @ 3.0GHz
MOTHERBOARD: Asus A8N SLI
RAM: 4x1GB Corsair XMS DDR400 @ 2.5-3-3-6
PSU: eVGA 600BQ
GPU: Sapphire HD5870
SOUNDCARD: Asus Xonar DG
OPTICAL: DVDRW with Lightscribe
SSD/NVME: 64GB HP 2.5" SSD
Full Rig Info

Too much

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Athlon 1100MHz
MOTHERBOARD: ECS K7S5A
RAM: 2x256MB Corsair XMS DDR400 @ 133MHz / CAS2
PSU: Antec 350w
GPU: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
SOUNDCARD: Creative Live! 5.1
OPTICAL: LG 16x DVD-ROM
OPTICAL 2: IOMagic 48x16x48 CDRW
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.4k 822
12 hours ago, pioneerisloud said:

Now this is a proper comparison and review!  I still say, its looking promising. 🙂 

 

EDIT:
I do have to say, after getting myself a freesync monitor, the 1% lows are actually more important to me than averages are anymore these days.  They say the A380 is 7% slower overall than the RX6400 is at 1080p, but that's based off averages.  If you look at the 1% lows, it looks like it might be telling a different story.

Interesting to note too how BADLY the A380 actually performs on DX9 titles (CS:GO).  Intel does state the GPU is tuned more for modern API's though, and it was more than playable still.  Just interesting there. 

 

 

 

Barely beat a vega 8 😭 it so bad

 

 

 

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb Gskill 6400 cl36-48-48 1.4v
PSU: Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold White Edition
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: CoolerMaster NR200P White Mini ITX
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Asus Strix G15 AE 6800m 5900hx 32gb ram 1440p
RAM: MSI GT60 Dominator 870m 4800MQ
GPU: Alienware M11x R2 i7 640um Nvidia 335m 8gb Ram
MONITOR: Lenovo X270 1080p i7 7600u 16gb ram
SSD/NVME: Acer Chromebook 11.6
Full Rig Info

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 5560u
MOTHERBOARD: Beelink SER5 Mini PC Box
RAM: 2x32gb Sodimm
CASE: Jonsbo N1 Mini ITX
HDD: 8TB + 4TB HDD + 2 x Intel DC S3500 800GB
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/08/2022 at 03:10, bonami2 said:

 

 

 

Barely beat a vega 8 😭 it so bad

 

 

 

To be fair, the APU's from AMD are pretty freaking good.  You're right, but the same could also be said about the RX 6400 and GTX 1050 (which is a MID tier card mind you....its just older).

 

 

On 14/08/2022 at 07:06, schuck6566 said:

Drivers,We need,better,drivers..... 🤒 

(AMD on the side) "Isn't that OUR line?"

(Nvidia behind the many years of drivers piled in a wall) 😉

Yes, Intel needs better drivers seeing as they're brand new to the GPU scene now.  Granted, they've been doing integrated graphics for years, so I guess they're just as guilty as the others about being lazy.

AMD drivers have been pretty solid for years now, with only the occasional hiccup anymore.  I've been rocking AMD cards since the 7970 and I've never had a driver issue up until their latest 22.7..1's, and I only tested that on my 6900XT.

Nvidia on the other hand, has actually killed hardware with bad drivers (something AMD / ATI has never done). G92's and even as recently as the 980Ti's if I recall correctly.

 

One has a more modern interface and interlaces quite well with games, and the other looks like it came straight off Windows 98.  So really, which company really needs to fix their drivers more?  🤭

 

Complaining about drivers is such a thing of the past anyway.  If you have a driver that doesn't work right, rollback to a previous one.  Same can be said for all 3 companies.  The fact that we now have 3 competing companies for our GPU needs, in my opinion is a welcome change, being Intel or not.  We keep forgetting, this A380 is a LOW END card too, as such it absolutely should perform at the low end especially at $120 USD release.  Hey....it beats Intel integrated graphics doesn't it?  🙂 

  • Thanks 1
  • Respect 1

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 7900x
GPU: Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX
PSU: Cooler Master 850w Platinum
CPU COOLER: Cooler Master MasterLiquid PL360 Flux
MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte B650 Aorus AX
SSD/NVME: Solidigm P41 Plus 2TB Gen4 NVME
RAM: G.Skill Flare X DDR5-6000
CASE: HAF700 Berserker
Full Rig Info

Too much

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Opteron 180 @ 3.0GHz
MOTHERBOARD: Asus A8N SLI
RAM: 4x1GB Corsair XMS DDR400 @ 2.5-3-3-6
PSU: eVGA 600BQ
GPU: Sapphire HD5870
SOUNDCARD: Asus Xonar DG
OPTICAL: DVDRW with Lightscribe
SSD/NVME: 64GB HP 2.5" SSD
Full Rig Info

Too much

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Athlon 1100MHz
MOTHERBOARD: ECS K7S5A
RAM: 2x256MB Corsair XMS DDR400 @ 133MHz / CAS2
PSU: Antec 350w
GPU: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
SOUNDCARD: Creative Live! 5.1
OPTICAL: LG 16x DVD-ROM
OPTICAL 2: IOMagic 48x16x48 CDRW
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This Website may place and access certain Cookies on your computer. ExtremeHW uses Cookies to improve your experience of using the Website and to improve our range of products and services. ExtremeHW has carefully chosen these Cookies and has taken steps to ensure that your privacy is protected and respected at all times. All Cookies used by this Website are used in accordance with current UK and EU Cookie Law. For more information please see our Privacy Policy