Jump to content

Welcome to ExtremeHW

Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.

 

Registered users can: 

  • Start new topics and reply to others.
  • Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
  • Get your own profile page to customize.
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Take advantage of site exclusive features.
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.
IGNORED

AMD: 7800X3D up to 24% faster than Intel


Recommended Posts

  Quote

AMD has released official gaming benchmark results for its upcoming 8-core Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor, which is set to launch in April. The benchmark shows that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Intel's Core i9-13900K by up to 24%.

Expand  

 

Source: Guru3D

 

 

 

untitled-1.jpg

876ty.png

fgfd.png

 

1080p gamers rejoice! 

Edited by UltraMega
  • Thanks 3
  • Respect 1

null

Owned

 Share

CPU: 5800x
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS TUF Gaming B550-Plus
RAM: 32GB 3600mhz CL16
GPU: 7900XT
SOUNDCARD: Sound Blaster Z 5.1 home theater
MONITOR: 4K 65 inch TV
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.5k 867

The sad thing is all of those game are at 200+ fps on a 13900k 🙁

Horizon is singlethreaded was using 20-40% of one of my 13900k core probably e core not even p core.

 

Wonder how future game will perform. Still a great cpu power comsumption probably insane low 😎

null

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb 8000mhz @7600
PSU: 1300w XPG Cybercore Platinum
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: Corsair 7000D Airflow White
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say AMD is sandbagging pretty hard by waiting till April to launch this, but guess that's how they push more 7900X3D and 7950X3D on gamers who don't need them.

 

7800X3D should be a a monster, plus no scheduling issues like its bigger counterparts.

null

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 CL14)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: be Quiet! Straight Power 12 1500W
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.5k 867
  On 16/03/2023 at 20:40, mouacyk said:

Bring it on. VR really needs these levels of performance.  Also, OLED motion clarity at 240Hz demands it.

Expand  

Only issue for VR is we need a 10999 RTX Dual die gpu 😁  8k per eye 😅

null

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb 8000mhz @7600
PSU: 1300w XPG Cybercore Platinum
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: Corsair 7000D Airflow White
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/03/2023 at 04:10, bonami2 said:

Only issue for VR is we need a 10999 RTX Dual die gpu 😁  8k per eye 😅

Expand  

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

Edited by mouacyk
  • Respect 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Media Manager
1.5k 867
  On 17/03/2023 at 16:35, mouacyk said:

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

Expand  

At a point i see 35% cpu usage 13900k and 48% 7950x3d that where you see that the 13900k is a monster. Low are pretty close but the 13900k as worse minimum fps. 

We need multithreading optimisation the 7950x3d just show how most game are not really well optimised.

null

Owned

 Share

MOTHERBOARD: MSI MPG Z790i EDGE
CPU: Intel 13900k + Top Mounted 280mm Aio
RAM: 2x24gb 8000mhz @7600
PSU: 1300w XPG Cybercore Platinum
GPU: UHD ULTRA EXTREME BANANA GRAPHIC
MONITOR: [Monitor] LG CX48 OLED [VR] Samsung HMD Odyssey Plus OLED + Meta Quest 2 120hz
CASE: Corsair 7000D Airflow White
SSD/NVME: 2TB Intel 660p 1tb sn850 1tb sn770
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/03/2023 at 16:35, mouacyk said:

No doubt about that being needed.  However, there is an obvious priority for VR and that is frame pacing.  Having the visuals rendered at just a few millimeters away from the retnas will make any kind of stutter a jarring experience.

 

I hope viewers understand what's important in this video, albeit it's just a few pixels:

 

Expand  

There's a reason reviewers don't show 4k results in CPU reviews. It's because if you're testing CPUs, you need to create a bottleneck for that part. Running at 4k is largely pointless solely due to how it's 100% a GPU bottleneck, as showcased here. Yes, there is some variance, but the difference is notably larger at 1440p and 1080p, where you'd want to use these parts.

 

I personally find the 7000X3D parts a little lackluster if only because the 5800X3D is so good. I can see why AMD didn't launch a 16-core X3D part with Ryzen 5000. It'd have completely invalidated Zen 4 across the board. xD 

$2000~

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MOTHERBOARD: ASRock B550M Steel Legend
GPU: Radeon 12GB RX 6700XT
RAM: 64GB G.Skill DDR4 3200 CL16
SSD/NVME: 512GB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 4) NVMe
SSD/NVME 2: 1TB WD Black (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 3: 2TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 4: 2TB Samsung EVO (SATA)
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 19/03/2023 at 04:03, Imglidinhere said:

There's a reason reviewers don't show 4k results in CPU reviews. It's because if you're testing CPUs, you need to create a bottleneck for that part. Running at 4k is largely pointless solely due to how it's 100% a GPU bottleneck, as showcased here. Yes, there is some variance, but the difference is notably larger at 1440p and 1080p, where you'd want to use these parts.

 

I personally find the 7000X3D parts a little lackluster if only because the 5800X3D is so good. I can see why AMD didn't launch a 16-core X3D part with Ryzen 5000. It'd have completely invalidated Zen 4 across the board. xD 

Expand  

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

Edited by Sir Beregond
  • Thanks 1

null

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 CL14)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: be Quiet! Straight Power 12 1500W
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premium Platinum - Lifetime
1.3k 819

Having the 7900x3d myself, and playing at 3440x1440p 144hz, and having an 4090, the R9 5900x was bottlenecking me.

 

I really only play Forza Horizon 4 and 5 and here's the result:

 

168 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 5900x

192 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 7900x3d

195 fps in FH5 benchmark on Ultra with the 7900x3d with cas 30 6200MHz RAM

 

I'm happy. About the cross CCD latency penalties and the like, if you install the correct chipset drivers with x3d optimizations, and set Windows power plan to Ryzen Balanced, then when the system detects a gaming load it will park cores in the non-V-Cache CCD to enable the V-Cache CCD to only run the load while idling the other. I'm satisfied with my purchase even if it probably is slower than a 13900k or ks, especially if they are running DDR5-7000+.

  • Thanks 2

{"USD":"5179"}

Owned

 Share

CPU: Ryzen 9 9950X
MOTHERBOARD: Asus ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming Wifi
RAM: G.skill TridentZ5 7600MHz 36-45-45-45
GPU: MSI Gaming X Trio RTX 4090
MONITOR: Acer Ultrawide 3440x1440 144Hz HDR400 FreeSync Premium
SSD/NVME: Crucial T700 1TB PCIE 5 M.2
PSU: Superflower Leadex VII XG 1300w Gold
CPU COOLER: EK Nucleus AIO black edition 360mm
Full Rig Info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 19/03/2023 at 17:38, Sir Beregond said:

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

Expand  

 

I agree on both issues. 4K is becoming more widely used, and apart from minimum FPS, there are games and sims when at least a RTX 4090 (and presumably subsequent models such as 4090 Ti/ Titan Ada) can get bottle-necked at 4K by the CPU. What is more, DLSS3/FrameIns/NVReflex also impact heavily at 4K (in a positive way).

 

As to 7800X3D (and even the older 5800X3D), it clearly is the gamer's choice. For folks like myself who are using these things for productivity, the 7950X3D makes more sense, not least as you can set it to 'just' be a 7800X3D but still retain the full 32 threads when needed for productivity. 

 

 

Edited by J7SC_Orion
  • Thanks 2

Owned

 Share

CPU: CPU: ><.......7950X3D - Aorus X670E Master - 48GB DDR5 7200 (8000) TridentZ SK Hynix - Giga-G-OC/Galax RTX 4090 670W - LG 48 OLED - 4TB NVMEs >< .......5950X - Asus CH 8 Dark Hero - 32GB CL13 DDR4 4000 - AMD R 6900XT 500W - Philips BDM40 4K VA - 2TB NVME & 3TB SSDs >> - <<.......4.4 TR 2950X - MSI X399 Creation - 32 GB CL 14 3866 - Asus RTX 3090 Strix OC/KPin 520W and 2x RTX 2080 Ti Gigabyte XTR WF WB 380W - LG 55 IPS HDR - 1TB NVME & 4TB SSDs
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 19/03/2023 at 17:38, Sir Beregond said:

Yes, this is true. Still I do like seeing 4k results too just to get an idea of how minimums perform.

 

Really the only Zen 4 X3D part I find of any interest will be the 7800X3D. I see where the split CCD's might benefit someone like @J7SC_Orion where they can still provide good productivity performance as well as gaming performance boost, but from a gamer only perspective, why mess with parts that have to work right in the Windows scheduler, and have cross CCD latency penalties? Clearly the 7800X3D will be the one to get for gamers.

 

I'd be really curious to see if Zen 5 increases the core count per CCX. We went from 4 in Zen 2 to 8 in Zen 3. Would be nice to see that double again. Imagine a 12 or 16 core Zen 5 part but that's all on one CCX on one CCD. No latency penalty crossing the Infinity Fabric between CCD's and you could have the 3D v-cache on higher core parts without this split CCD's you're getting on the 7900X3D and 7950X3D.

Expand  

I'm not so sure we really need to increase core count. If the rumored 30% IPC uplift actually happens with Zen 5, that alone will improve multicore performance by something to the tune of 50-60% at minimum.

 

I am tempering my expectations with Zen 5, even though Zen 4 was already beyond my expectations across the board in every regard. Here's to hoping AMD can keep up the momentum.

Edited by Imglidinhere
  • Respect 2

$2000~

Owned

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MOTHERBOARD: ASRock B550M Steel Legend
GPU: Radeon 12GB RX 6700XT
RAM: 64GB G.Skill DDR4 3200 CL16
SSD/NVME: 512GB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 4) NVMe
SSD/NVME 2: 1TB WD Black (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 3: 2TB Sabrent Rocket (Gen 3) NVMe
SSD/NVME 4: 2TB Samsung EVO (SATA)
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 21/03/2023 at 23:25, Imglidinhere said:

I'm not so sure we really need to increase core count. If the rumored 30% IPC uplift actually happens with Zen 5, that alone will improve multicore performance by something to the tune of 50-60% at minimum.

 

I am tempering my expectations with Zen 5, even though Zen 4 was already beyond my expectations across the board in every regard. Here's to hoping AMD can keep up the momentum.

Expand  

Yeah I agree. Just wondering the next logical architectural change for Ryzen. I could see a push for more core count given the lack of really continuing to support Threadripper platforms.

 

As for how good Zen 5 is, probably depends on where we land with TSMC 3nm.

  • Respect 1

null

Showcase

 Share

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB DDR4-3600 (@ 3733 CL14)
MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
SSD/NVME: x2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB
SSD/NVME 2: Crucial MX500 1TB
PSU: be Quiet! Straight Power 12 1500W
MONITOR: LG 42" C4 OLED
Full Rig Info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This Website may place and access certain Cookies on your computer. ExtremeHW uses Cookies to improve your experience of using the Website and to improve our range of products and services. ExtremeHW has carefully chosen these Cookies and has taken steps to ensure that your privacy is protected and respected at all times. All Cookies used by this Website are used in accordance with current UK and EU Cookie Law. For more information please see our Privacy Policy