So, while I said no Asus....Annoyingly, out of the bunch right now, the Asus ProArt seems to have the best balanced feature set so far. It has a really up to date external I/O feature set which no other board is offering and unlike some of the boards in a similar price range has 2x GEN 5 M.2 slots and 2x GEN 5 PCie x16 Slots. I am not planning to do heavy overclocking, it comes with a smaller 16+1 Power Stage at 70 Amps but unless someone says otherwise, I cannot see that being a huge limiting factor here. With time being low and Overclocking being less of a priority these days (Yes I said it), I think it could be a winner at its price point, currently £559. I am not really looking to keep upgrading the motherboard as it is one of those items I think should last a few gens before you "Have" to swap it out. Though that is still a question mark with Intel with there socket changes, that being said the Pro Art is also available on AM5.
After taking a look at virtually all the boards, they all seem to have rather annoying nuances, such as only 1x PCIe 5 M.2 slot, which they think is OK to make up with by providing an additional add-in card, or only 1x PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot....with the rest being PCIe 3.0. I am looking at you Gigabyte Aorus Master, which ironically on the surface looked like a decent board until you check under the hood. Though, they are not the only guilty ones.
The MSI Godlike is also a weird one, while you are paying for some gimmicks like the integrated screen etc, at £1100+ I would expect more that ONE...yes ONE Gen 5 M.2 slot. All the other 6 M.2's are Gen 4. I know the board has more focus on Overclocking and increased memory speed compatibility but I would have hoped for a more logical layout.
Not sure if it is me, but the way GEN 5 for PCie has been utilized on some of these boards is dumb at best. I would understand it at the lower priced segment, but in the £550+ market or at the more wild £1100+, that is absolute bull.
Perhaps I am just grumpy!