Welcome to ExtremeHW
Welcome to ExtremeHW, register to take part in our community, don't worry this is a simple FREE process that requires minimal information for you to signup.
Registered users can:
- Start new topics and reply to others.
- Show off your PC using our Rig Creator feature.
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get updates.
- Get your own profile page to customize.
- Send personal messages to other members.
- Take advantage of site exclusive features.
- Upgrade to Premium to unlock additional sites features.
-
Posts
1,335 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by neurotix
-
I found a link on a Chinese site that had 1.5 something but clicking the link to download it gave a redirect to Baidu, and no download. I wouldn't trust it. Ultimately, beggers can't be choosers. Unless you want to pony up $10 to 1usmus, use the one I just uploaded.
-
Here is Hydra 1.3F PRO. Download link expires in 14 days. HYDRA 1.3F PRO WWW.MEDIAFIRE.COM
-
My experience with Hydra wasn't so good, I ran the diagnosis and it tested all my cores for CO values, but some were really low like -40 or -50. I tried applying the CO values then moved my mouse and instantly got a bsod. Same thing with doing hybrid oc using the CO values and +200 PBO at the same time. I wonder if the 1.3g version isn't compatible with X3D chips. For some reason I can't get to that website link with the download of 1.3g, it says https is required and it's sending back an invalid cert. I will zip and upload 1.3g after this post. It's 400mb and I can't upload to this site, nor the external host I usually use. It is also 1.3F. Hopefully E got 1.3g from that kemono link already, or maybe its just a problem on my end with my internet atm.
-
Think I'm probably going to get a t shirt. What printing method are you using? Dye sublimation this time?
-
Yeah, the link I posted will still work fine and accomplish the same purpose. It should also be virus-free. I've heard the 1.5 version downloads you can find may have malware.
-
"HYDRA 1.3G PRO (major DCFR update) - RELEASED!" by 1usmus from Patreon | Kemono KEMONO.SU Click the dl link there. You're welcome.
-
Awesome. Good going. One suggestion though: I have or could make a lighter version of the icons below the logo, the dark red on black looks like it's not showing up well/not enough contrast with the black mousepad. If you guys think it's fine then no worries, but I have a version of it with a lighter red to dark red gradient on the icons. I could even see about lightening the whole logo too so it isn't as muddy and illegible on the black desk pad (which I might buy )
-
Yep. As I said a few posts ago, set it and forget it with your current results, but you did even better. You are probably right; no other ways you can improve it and going to high frequency RAM won't matter on your CPU. What do you use your PC for? If it's mostly gaming, latency matters more than bandwidth but bandwidth does make a difference (it did for me anyway). Btw, these are my current AIDA results if you're curious.
-
It is well known for Zen 4 to change tREFI to 65535. On Asus boards (what I have), it gives like 20000GB/sec more bandwidth. That's only on Asus boards but I am unsurprised to see you getting better results with it set that way. Good job
-
I don't understand the whole P-Core/E-Core thing, I don't understand their RAM timings, and Z790 is a dead platform so your buddy is going to eventually need a whole new motherboard. I bench and they are way better for benching, especially the older 3dmark benchmarks, 3dm11 and older. However, I wanted to support AMD and while Zen 4 is a marginal improvement over Zen 3+, Zen 5 is supposed to be fantastic so I wanted to have an upgrade route. http://hwbot.org/user/neurotix Intel finished 2nm and 1.5nm fabs in somewhere like Ohio that are due to come online in 2025, Zen 5 will be out by then, and I'll find out if I made a mistake. Personally I would really like to see higher core counts on Zen chips, something like a 24c/48t for $750 and 20c/40t for $500 to replace the 32 and 24 thread offerings now.
-
A lot of people neglect inter-CCX latency too. (The time it takes data to cross the Infinity Fabric to another CCD) Though, I am not sure what settings optimize it besides raising fclk. The old Zen 3 Ryzen DRAM Calculator had a inter-CCX latency option to test it with, but I have no idea if it would work with or would be accurate with Zen 4. Nice. 58ns. Too bad my sticks or IMC isn't stable at your speed and timings. However, the difference for me between 7600 and 8000 was like 97GB/sec to 99GB/sec so I don't think I am losing very much performance. As I've said before though, for me going from 6200 to 7600 has made a *big* difference, like 10 more FPS in Forza Horizon 5 benchmark. Higher minimums, higher framerate in Quake II RTX @3440x1440 144hz. I also love the RGB on the ram and it works with Asus' Aura Creator too.
-
I *think* maybe Fluxmaven, who also has a 7700x (or did) may also have posted an AIDA with that low of latency. But I don't think Flux follows or posts in this thread. The single CCD chips can get lower latency afaik. But it's looking pretty good to me.
-
You're at sub-60ns, that's a really incredible overclock, that's literally like the only AIDA of Zen 4 that I've ever seen with latency that low. I'd set it and forget it and not worry about lowering timings further. That is an excellent overclock and should be great for gaming or anything else you do, assuming it is stable.
-
@Hurricane28can you post your AIDA64 again? Also let Windows be booted for at least 15 minutes and you'll get more accurate results as if you do it when you first boot it's still running a lot of background tasks and phoning home etc
-
Looks good to me. You should probably be sub-62ns timing in AIDA64? You're at cas 30 already. The other primary timings look good even though 36 or lower is ideal. Try lowering tFAW to 16 and tCWL to 24 or 20. I couldn't even run 6400 on my B-Die kit, but had lower timings at 6200 before I upgraded to what I have now.
-
Can you post your ZenTimings of what you're running now? I'm sure they're in this thread somewhere else but I can't be bothered to read back and find them.
-
I have it but haven't tried OC'ing my memory since I updated, nor trying higher fclk. I require stability for folding@home 24/7 and Samba server for streaming to Raspberry Pis in Linux. So I stick to what I have that's proven stable, 7600MHz 36-45-45-45 and 2100fclk. I *can* however remark that post time even from a cold boot is greatly decreased, from like 15sec to train the ram to like maybe 5 seconds tops total post time. With Memory Context Restore on. Also @Hurricane28*shameless plug* take a look at my G.skill Flare X kit on sale in the marketplace here. Those timings I gave you (30-36-36-36-108-4-6-16) were from that kit. It's not RGB but it is Samsung B-Die DDR5 and is really good at 6000-6400 if you are after low timing at those speeds.
-
@J7SC_Orionruns his RAM at 8.1Ghz, people do it here too. No longer an OCN reader... Also I can run 8000 for benching or gaming but it won't pass my stability tests...
-
Why not? Too much power draw?
-
I'm in 2nd currently but pretty sure PaperClip, Flux and possibly Avacado will pass me by the end of it.
-
I run an RTX 4090 overclocked in Linux 24/7. I'm pretty sure the PPD is significantly higher. Though how much, I don't know. I can say that most people say a 4090 should be good for 25m/day the most I've ever done is 36m *actual points* in a day. If I'm lucky with WU assignment lately, I can do 27~28m points in a day. If it's a bad day I do 22m or even just 20m. Got both cards running and overclocked. The 3060 is OCed and crunching in Windows in my wifes rig.
-
About 24 hours to go, yeah!