Forums first comp: CPUz Benchmark

[Sir Beregond]

23 minutes ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

Playing around with the 10900x, that thing is not easy to cool and I need to do a lot more tuning before this will work on other benchmarks.
I managed to run GB3 too, but the memory isn't much on that thing as it wasn't meant for benchmarking when I bought this stuff.

 

6804.1 multi and 594.6 single, 7398.7 total @5ghz all core
(and I messed up the screenshot, 2x mem tab instead of 1x mem and 1x mainboard )

Huh, never heard of a 10900X, was that a highly binned 10900k?

[Mr. Fox]

4 hours ago, Sir Beregond said:

Huh, never heard of a 10900X, was that a highly binned 10900k?

That is an X299 LGA 2066 HEDT processor. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/198019/intel-core-i910900x-xseries-processor-19-25m-cache-3-70-ghz.html

[Sir Beregond]

4 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

That is an X299 LGA 2066 HEDT processor. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/198019/intel-core-i910900x-xseries-processor-19-25m-cache-3-70-ghz.html

Didn't even realize they were still releasing X299 LGA 2066 stuff that recently. Thanks.

[Storm-Chaser]

12 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

That is an X299 LGA 2066 HEDT processor. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/198019/intel-core-i910900x-xseries-processor-19-25m-cache-3-70-ghz.html

I want one - looks like they have a good bit of potential. Although, the supported motherboards are probably insanely expensive.

[Bastiaan_NL]

16 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

That is an X299 LGA 2066 HEDT processor. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/198019/intel-core-i910900x-xseries-processor-19-25m-cache-3-70-ghz.html

Correct, this chip in combination with the motherboard is great for a F@H farm because of the PCIE lanes. 

 

3 hours ago, Storm-Chaser said:

I want one - looks like they have a good bit of potential. Although, the supported motherboards are probably insanely expensive.

It's really expensive stuff, the main reason I bought this was to fold with more GPU's in a single system increasing the efficiency instead of having 3 systems online all the time. By now the power is so expensive that I have one GPU online, and I'm thinking about taking that one offline too (€0.51 per kWh).

The CPU runs very hot, making it hard to get a decent OC to work. 5ghz was for fun, but running this for anything besides an easy benchmark will shoot the temps up to at least 85°C if not higher.

 

 

A few more pictures: 

Spoiler

 

 

 

[Storm-Chaser]

1 hour ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

It's really expensive stuff, the main reason I bought this was to fold with more GPU's in a single system increasing the efficiency instead of having 3 systems online all the time. By now the power is so expensive that I have one GPU online, and I'm thinking about taking that one offline too (€0.51 per kWh).

The CPU runs very hot, making it hard to get a decent OC to work. 5ghz was for fun, but running this for anything besides an easy benchmark will shoot the temps up to at least 85°C if not higher.

Are you running liquid metal in this rig? That would definitely shave 5-10 degrees off peak temps. Though, you have to be careful with it, liquid metal is hard to work with and you can easily damage that killer motherboard you have. I usually wrap everything but the CPU, making it a little easier to not mess up. 

[Avacado]

12 minutes ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Are you running liquid metal in this rig? That would definitely shave 5-10 degrees off peak temps. Though, you have to be careful with it, liquid metal is hard to work with and you can easily damage that killer motherboard you have. I usually wrap everything but the CPU, making it a little easier to not mess up. 

He's fully capable. He lapped that CPU, but it does not have a delid tool. LM on top of the stock IHS won't bring down the temps enough to warrant corroding a CPU WB. Even though it would still function 100% thermally, it's a PITA to clean/sand when you are done with it. 

Edited July 8, 2022 by Avacado

[Storm-Chaser]

31 minutes ago, Avacado said:

He's fully capable. He lapped that CPU, but it does not have a delid tool. LM on top of the stock IHS won't bring down the temps enough to warrant corroding a CPU WB. Even though it would still function 100% thermally, it's a PITA to clean/sand when you are done with it. 

Yeah I don't doubt that. I was just so impressed when I switched to liquid metal so I always mention it. Asus board is absolutely sick. 

Edited July 8, 2022 by Storm-Chaser

[Avacado]

11 minutes ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Yeah I don't doubt that. I was just so impressed when I switched to liquid metal so I always mention it. Also note that his Asus board is absolutely sick. 

Yes indeedy. Iv'e been whining about not having that sage for years now. 

[Bastiaan_NL]

1 hour ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Are you running liquid metal in this rig? That would definitely shave 5-10 degrees off peak temps. Though, you have to be careful with it, liquid metal is hard to work with and you can easily damage that killer motherboard you have. I usually wrap everything but the CPU, making it a little easier to not mess up. 

I wish I could delid it, but by just looking at the IHS it seems like it's glued in place in such a way I would damage the chip before getting the IHS off.
As far as LM goes, I've done a few chips. Not as much as a few other members, but I wouldn't be afraid of that part of the 'mod'. 

 

1 hour ago, Avacado said:

He's fully capable. He lapped that CPU, but it does not have a delid tool. LM on top of the stock IHS won't bring down the temps enough to warrant corroding a CPU WB. Even though it would still function 100% thermally, it's a PITA to clean/sand when you are done with it. 

'fully capable', thanks brother

 

38 minutes ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Yeah I don't doubt that. I was just so impressed when I switched to liquid metal so I always mention it. Also note that his Asus board is absolutely sick. 

The board is art, there are a few things that should have been different but I know why they did it (6pin in the middle of the board for example) but it's so cool.
And the weight is crazy, I've never felt a board being this heavy without all those full cover heatsinks like some 'gaming' or 'overclocking' boards have, just filled with components.

 

26 minutes ago, Avacado said:

Yes indeedy. Iv'e been whining about not having that sage for years now. 

Haha, ikr. Glad your drool is staying on your side of the stream

[Mr. Fox]

6 hours ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

The CPU runs very hot, making it hard to get a decent OC to work. 5ghz was for fun, but running this for anything besides an easy benchmark will shoot the temps up to at least 85°C if not higher.

It needs to be delidded and run bare die with a der8auer die frame. I used to bench my 7960X (16C/32T) at 5.3GHz all core and my 7980XE (18C/36T) at 5.2GHz all core in my X299 Dark mobo. Both CPUs used to pull over 1,000W in Cinebench. It was too stinking awesome for words. That was one of several reasons I found owning a 5950X to be such a massive disappointment.  I expected the same, but it was not capable of coming close to that, even with chilled water cooling.

Edited July 8, 2022 by Mr. Fox

[J7SC_Orion]

1 hour ago, Mr. Fox said:

It needs to be delidded and run bare die with a der8auer die frame. I used to bench my 7960X (16C/32T) at 5.3GHz all core and my 7980XE (18C/36T) at 5.2GHz all core in my X299 Dark mobo. Both CPUs used to pull over 1,000W in Cinebench. It was too stinking awesome for words. That was one of several reasons I found owning a 5950X to be such a massive disappointment.  I expected the same, but it was not capable of coming close to that, even with chilled water cooling.

 

...I dunno, I kind of like the 5950X, after using Intel HEDT for years (which have their own charms, of course).

 

5950X at ~ 240 W for CinebenchR23 (water-cooled, ambient temps). I could try to go higher, but not in July 

 

[Sir Beregond]

2 hours ago, J7SC_Orion said:

 

...I dunno, I kind of like the 5950X, after using Intel HEDT for years (which have their own charms, of course).

 

5950X at ~ 240 W for CinebenchR23 (water-cooled, ambient temps). I could try to go higher, but not in July 

 

Damn that's nice. What kind of clocks are you getting?

[J7SC_Orion]

22 minutes ago, Sir Beregond said:

Damn that's nice. What kind of clocks are you getting?

 

It's a good chip - CCX1 can get to 4.925 (8c/16t), CCX2  can get to 4850 (8c/16t) max, but the above was 'only' 4750 (16c/32t) because ambient was 25C. Best single core can get to ~ 5060 effective / 5125 nominal.

[Sir Beregond]

1 hour ago, J7SC_Orion said:

 

It's a good chip - CCX1 can get to 4.925 (8c/16t), CCX2  can get to 4850 (8c/16t) max, but the above was 'only' 4750 (16c/32t) because ambient was 25C. Best single core can get to ~ 5060 effective / 5125 nominal.

That's fantastic.

[J7SC_Orion]

46 minutes ago, Sir Beregond said:

That's fantastic.

 

1320 x 62 rads w/ push-pull help.

 

BTW, have you dived into Ryzen RAM tuning / rabbit holes yet w/your build ?

[Sir Beregond]

39 minutes ago, J7SC_Orion said:

 

1320 x 62 rads w/ push-pull help.

 

BTW, have you dived into Ryzen RAM tuning / rabbit holes yet w/your build ?

Not really. Haven't had much of that sort of free time the past couple of weeks. Have an Aquacomputer Octo I still need to install too.

[Bastiaan_NL]

10 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

It needs to be delidded and run bare die with a der8auer die frame. I used to bench my 7960X (16C/32T) at 5.3GHz all core and my 7980XE (18C/36T) at 5.2GHz all core in my X299 Dark mobo. Both CPUs used to pull over 1,000W in Cinebench. It was too stinking awesome for words. That was one of several reasons I found owning a 5950X to be such a massive disappointment.  I expected the same, but it was not capable of coming close to that, even with chilled water cooling.

I'm not sure if I want to go that far with this chip, the only reason I installed it is that I wanted to have some fun with the hardware as it was sitting in a box. 

 

6 hours ago, J7SC_Orion said:

 

It's a good chip - CCX1 can get to 4.925 (8c/16t), CCX2  can get to 4850 (8c/16t) max, but the above was 'only' 4750 (16c/32t) because ambient was 25C. Best single core can get to ~ 5060 effective / 5125 nominal.

Ambient kills the fun over here too, 10°C or less works way better while overclocking  

 

[J7SC_Orion]

20 hours ago, Bastiaan_NL said:

...

Ambient kills the fun over here too, 10°C or less works way better while overclocking  

 

 

10 C ambient would be nice indeed...I might even scratch 33K in CineR23 w/ 10 C and full-tilt OC. As you know, I love benching, but even at 25 C and daily 24/7 trim, I get CineR23 at 31.5k w/o breaking a sweat. The oversized loop is near-silent and doesn't heatsoak even after hours of FS2020 (below near 'Rivers' Inlet' up the coast) and CyberP2077 on 4K max everything.  I don't know how tempted I will be with the next-gen AMD and/or Intel CPUs, and next-gen GPUs (4090 Ti with 18432 Cores, 192 ROPS ) but for now...

 

[Avacado]

Screw you guys. #Winning

 

 

Edited July 23, 2022 by Avacado

[pio]

1 minute ago, Avacado said:

Screw you guys. #Winning

 

 

You know, one of these days I'm going to fire up my K6, and all low speed records will be lost.  

[bonami2]

2 hours ago, Avacado said:

Screw you guys. #Winning

 

 

Younger i was playing Runescape on a pentium m 730

[Storm-Chaser]

2 hours ago, Avacado said:

Screw you guys. #Winning

 

 

Congratulations with your win in the only loser category of the entire competition LOL!

 

But....

 

[The Pook]

Asus used to make an adapter to run 479 CPUs in 478, I wanted one back in the day. You could usually get 2.5 or so out of them and they pooped on higher clocked P4s. 

 

[pio]

My MX-5 arrives today.......do I dare see if I can get a CPUz bench on Windows 98?  I'm not sure if it'll run, and I'd be kinda going out of order on these rigs I'm working on......

 

Once I get in gear tonight working on things, I'll see if I can do just that, and I'll do a quick K6 run.  If not, I wanted to test my Socket A builds anyway.  Wouldn't be hard to put XP on one of those.