pio

I could, but then I'd need to retain the PCI ATA133 card. I have adapters that can convert IDE to SATA, and there's older HP SSD's that work fine in IDE mode. I'm actually doing that on my Socket 754 build. The problem with doing so, those adapters (because they're SATA I'm guessing), only work with ONE drive on the IDE channel. I've got 4 drives in there and 2 channels (if I take out the 160GB hdd that is). What's even cooler (to me), is that I "kinda" have internet access on the thing already. Ish. I setup a FTP on my NAS already, and I can connect to it with IE6.

Yeah, after some deliberation....I might be pulling the UltraATA 133 card and the 160GB HDD out of there. I've got Win98SE Plus! on it right now, and its using a whopping 1.5GB of space. I don't think even with Windows 2000 on here I'll ever need more than 32-64GB that the CF cards can give me. Probably better to save the 160GB HDD for my Athlon-XP build (with XP) coming up soon ish.

Update: May I present, "ThunderK7"! Specs: AMD Thunderbird K7 1100MHz 2x512MB Corsair Value DDR400 @ 133Mhz Antec PP-352X 350w PSU ATI Radeon 9800XT SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 sound card TP Link Gigabit LAN Adaptec Ultra ATA133 controller 16x DVD-ROM 48x16x48 CDRW Compact Flash Reader (will be painted, don't worry) Iomega ZIP250 Floppy Disk Seagate 160GB IDE Hard Drive Fully Restored Beige Chieftec Dragon case (Antec branded) Will eventually have Windows 2000 on it, trying XP on it now (it works, tested a week ago). I did the best I could do with the spaghetti cables, I think it turned out pretty decently considering all the cables in there. I did avoid using ribbon cables, even though there's no side panel window. Overall, I'm really pleased with how it turned out except that stupid black and white, very vibrant CF reader. Luckily I had extra paint on hand, so no big deal there.

You might find that the plywood might end up causing more vibrations than anything and it being an annoyance. The one in the corner works so well because its a corner, and probably well insulated walls. You shouldn't need to turn the gain up louder, the point of the second sub is to fill in the room better where the dead zones were at, and to change the "boosted" frequency some so you have a better overall sound out of them. Example, you might be getting say 45Hz peaks at your listening position out of the main sub, due to the room and where the sub is at. Adding the second one in, might not make it very much louder (a second sub adds about +3dB in a perfect scenario). BUT, it'll change that 45Hz peak frequency and fill it in so you have say 35-45Hz peak frequency, so it'll sound better. It definitely does add more pressure to the room, but again, you should in theory expect in a BEST case scenario a +3dB increase in output, which is about "double" to the human ear.

Same here. I'm absolutely MORE than content with my 5800x / 6900xt build. I was happy on my 3770k and RX 580 up until like 2 years ago or so, when I built my Ryzen 3600 / RX 580 (upgraded to 5700xt), and I only built that because my CPU failed when I delidded it. My monitor actually drove my upgrade when I picked up my giant ultrawide, moreso than my need for a better rig at 1080p or 1440p.

Been complaining about this since 8. Seems its still a thing. Are they going to start blocking older CPU's again instead of just decreasing performance? It's always about the same thing, buying the latest and greatest, which I'm okay with to a point (looks at my 5800x / 6900xt). It just really grinds my gears when they "patch" older equipment to be slower on purpose, or flat out block the use of older equipment entirely.

The RMA was denied by AMD this morning. Apparently my chip was an OEM CPU out of a pre-built. -_- Rage bought another 2600x on ebay for $90. Whatever, this should fix it this time.

Subwoofer channel, yes. Subs are never left and right, as any frequencies (typically) under 80Hz are "non directional", meaning you cannot tell a difference between left and right, front and back. It just fills the room. That's why with YOUR 12" subs I keep telling you to play around with room position. It doesn't matter WHERE a sub is at, so long as you're getting the most out of it. I mean, you "can" use left and right if you want to, but it really doesn't matter as much as your mid-bass 80Hz ish and up. This is also why in car setups you'll find subwoofers typically in the trunk. Not ONLY because of space concerns, but also because it just doesn't matter where they are in the car so long as you're getting the sound waves hitting your ears right. I've heard an MR2 with a sub in the "trunk" up front, and you can't tell a bit of difference where the sub is actually at. In the picture I shared, I was using two Dayton Ultimax 10" subs, in a tuned box at 2.45 cubic feet tuned to around 30Hz if I remember right. They dug down as deep as 25Hz with authority, and up to about 50Hz. Which meant my doors had to pick up from there. I had a little bit of a frequency gap, but man did it thump and hit low. My next build, I'm shooting for even lower tuning if I ever get to it. The 2200w was RATED power at 12.8v at 1.0ohm. I was running 14.6v ish (car running / 3 batteries / upgraded wiring), and 0.5ohm load on it. So yeah, was getting around 2800w RMS out of it (I think it clamped somewhere around 2775w or so). Going below rated resistance is NOT recommended unless you absolutely know the amp can handle it, as I've mentioned to you before. Those Soundqubed Q series car amps that I had were Korean based amplifiers capable of 0.5ohm loads, so it wasn't an issue. I actually ran that same amp just fine at 0.25ohm with 4 10's in my Acura too for a while, and dailied it at 0.33ohm with 3 10's. The Acura was where I started the build, the Honda was where I finished it and then it got stolen lol. Car setups are entirely different from house setups though, as the room / "cab" is bigger so you have more space for the sound wave to mature properly before it hits your ear. That's why those Klipsh subs at their what 250w RMS or so, impact you so incredibly well. The bigger the area you're filling (to an extent), and the larger the subwoofer box itself can be, generally the better its going to behave. It all depends on the tuning of everything though, including your room (or car cab). It also has to do with how much you can pressurize the room or cab as well, in a car that's harder to do with the windows, doors, and trunk lid flexing and letting air leak out. In a house, that issue doesn't happen as easily. This is why it takes several hundred watts or even thousands of watts in a car, whereas a good 250w sub is good in a home, or part of it.

Dayton Reference 7" woofers, crossed over at about 5kHz was what mine ran. My tweeters were 8ohm old Sony 1990 tower tweeters that I robbed because the woofers were busted. I was doing about 200w RMS or so to the 7" woofers, and about 60w RMS to the tweeters (also crossed over around 5kHz). My rears were just midrange and fill, Alpine Type S 6.5's with blown tweeters, and they were getting probably around 75w RMS or so each. The subs were getting almost 2800w RMS clamped out of that monoblock, running it at 0.5ohm.

Waiting to hear back from the seller on those cards on Saturday, he's out of town working and won't be home till then. So that's currently on pause. Excited about it though. The frustration continues with my kiddo's rig. Got the new ASRock B450m Pro4 in Saturday and decided to go ahead and give it a go last night. Still no go, no POST. It's weird, it'll work sometimes if I reseat it, and other times it won't, but it still freezes in BIOS too (on his original board). The CPU drops right into the socket, no problems at all. It's not acting like the pins are bent on it. Started an RMA request with AMD for the CPU as I don't see anything at all wrong with it. Attached is a picture of the pins. I have absolutely no clue what's wrong with it. I also just placed an order for a 2600x on ebay, it should be here hopefully next week sometime. Worst case, I'll have a spare CPU laying around I guess, or I can sell it on craigslist or something if AMD takes the RMA. Assuming his original B450m Pro4 works fine with the 2600x (it should since the CPU didn't work in a BNIB one), then I'll be sending the BNIB motherboard back as no longer needed / didn't work out. SIGH! -_-

I had that very SAME exact Pioneer 760w amplifier in my last big car build! You can almost see it there behind the giant "2200w" monoblock, on the left hand side. I was using that Pioneer 2ch 760w to power my front door woofers. The tweeters and rear speakers were powered off my Soundqubed Q90 4ch on the right, also behind the monoblock.

Just be careful with them, as I said before.....and they should last you a lifetime. I still say play with their positioning around the room too if you can. The second one definitely helps to fill in dead zones, but you might find the frequency changes as you move them around the room too due to the voids in the room. Now we just need to get you to step into some real speakers to match them, like your center, and you'll be all set!

Agreed wholeheartedly! We're clearly in an information war and have been for some time. Enough is enough. I say we demand the truth, and nothing BUT the truth. These bot farms, regardless of who operates them, are only there for one purpose, and that's to spread false information and propaganda.

After researching and researching the issue, I really feel like I'm never going to get an RX 580 working with the B350 board (nor with my friend's B450). Weird that they work fine in my personal B450 board, but whatever. Working on a deal right now with an ebay seller to buy a FuryX and a Vega64, and he's tossing in a 7950 for free since I'm a collector. This will mean that my GPU collection will be 100% complete if the deal goes through! (It also means a spare Tahiti card, which I won't say no to that, I LOVE Tahiti!) Crossfire HD7900's on my Phenom II 1100T rig? Maybe........ Talk about a bottleneck..... Here's to hoping that the FuryX doesn't have the same CSM bug as the RX 400 and RX 500 series cards. It shouldn't as its older. I haven't read any reports of the Fury lineup having the same bug anyway.

52 in a 45 is hardly "speeding". I mean yeah, its technically speeding, but still. Everybody does at least 5 over. The people saying wreckless driving.....wreckless driving doesn't come in until you're doing at LEAST 15 over. Worst case, it'd be a minor speeding ticket. No different than if you caught a police officer on a bad day writing you up for 2 over (had it happen). Either nobody in here has experience with the police, or ya'll have some seriously stuck up officers. Insurance wouldn't EVER claim it as his fault either, why would they? She clearly failed to yield to oncoming traffic.

@AvacadoI completely understand speeding a little over. I regularly do about 5-10 over because the cops just don't care around here either. Of course, its regularly dry around here being a desert. A quick lesson for defensive driving, especially in a situation like that, try to aim BEHIND the car, not in front of. Always assume the car is going to continue moving forward as most people panic in a situation like that and gas it. The swerve to the right is what screwed you up. Granted I wouldn't swerve into oncoming either, but had you braked when you swerved, and tried to go in behind her, you might've made it. Overall, you didn't do anything wrong there, she was very clearly in the wrong. And to top it off, her taking off. Good dashcam quality you have there.

No, needed a tougher laptop for my son's schooling last year. It was an HP ProBook, and buying an older one was the cheapest option I could find. I paid that much because I also put a SSD in there though, the SSD was as much as the base laptop cost lol. Mine came with the laptop, no RAM, no HDD, no battery. Laptop itself was $50, but you add in RAM, SSD, battery, and charger, and it adds up quickly. I mean overall, it wasn't too bad. Its a fantastic performing laptop still today for what my son needed it for.

If I didn't already have 3 laptops hanging around my house I don't use, I'd say count me in. That's honestly a REALLY good price on those. You should have no problems moving them. I just paid that much for a 1st gen i5 laptop (mostly because I had to piece it together).

Very good point. I didn't know about the 1630. I was thinking also the 1030 over the 1050Ti as another example, but yeah, you got what I meant. Agreed about the driver struggles. I don't think Intel was QUITE ready on that front. It's one thing to create a new bit of hardware, its an entirely different beast to try to make it work right with every single possible title out there. And yeah, there's the VRAM thing, but still.....the A380 is within margin of error there with the 6400. It's a really close race between those two, and the A380 is cheaper by quite a bit.....with early release drivers that Intel clearly wasn't ready for. I think Intel might actually have something promising here.

I'm going to be a little bit of an outlier here I think, but it looks promising to me. It's comparable to the RX 6400, which is also an entry level GPU, which that's what the A380 is too (supposedly). Sounds like they need some more work on the drivers, but that's to be expected on a brand new card, even from Nvidia or AMD. I dunno, I'm still kind of excited to see another player in the GPU market, so I'll be optimistic. Then again, I'm perfectly happy with the RX 6400's performance for where it is in the lineup too. A low end "1080p / low / medium" gaming card doing exactly what its advertised to do. Seems the A380 is similar. I don't understand the complaints here honestly. Let's not forget that the RX 570 and the GTX 1660 that they're trying to compare it to, or even the 1050Ti.....those weren't "low end" cards, they were mid to higher end cards from years past. That's not entirely fair, but the A380 is doing a decent job keeping up too though. It's like trying to game on a GT 210 waaaay back in the day. Or an 8400GS, or a HD5450. Except this time, you can actually expect to have a playable experience at 1080p / low or medium. The writer of this article needs to go read up on what a "low end" card actually is. Horribly misleading title, and bias included in the entire article. Of course an RX 570 or GTX 1660 is faster. The fact that this card can even attempt to keep up is absolutely fantastic. EDIT: I also noticed that the A380 has higher 1% minimums than the other cards mentioned in a lot of the tests. This means a smoother gameplay. Something people don't talk about with the RX 6400 and 6500 cards either. Yeah, the 570 and 580 are faster on average, but the newer cards give a smoother gaming experience.

Read through the whole thread, it seems they're having a different issue. Mine SEEMS to be CSM related with the RX580's. But I can't seem to figure out an exact solution to the problem. The card ran Valley for hours and hours, its clearly fine. The motherboard ran fine for days with the GTX 960, so again, fine. And its an issue on 2 completely different motherboards, a B350 and B450, but yet my other B450, the RX 580's run fine in it. They were also reporting BSOD's, I don't have that. I get the windows disconnect noise, and the screen immediately freezes. Upon a reboot, I can check event viewer, and it shows the GPU was disconnected. But yet there's no rhyme or reason for it to be happening. And yeah, its still doing it as of the last few tests when playing with CSM in the BIOS. I'm almost wondering if I need to update the VBIOS on the cards, but I can't seem to find a proper answer on that either.

Update: Removed OGC Map, traffic wasn't spawning correctly. Added: Downhill Destruction v1.12 Carkour Adventure v1.1 Parkour 3 v1.11 Cyberpunk Map v1.3.2 The Crash Hard 2.0 Map v1.3 Off-Road Trials by Hendrixx v1.0.1 Currently the server is loaded up with "Parkour 3". Carkour maps are a lot of fun. Full map list at the top has been updated. I can always swap to ANY of the maps listed, just have to let me know. Also, because of the mods list growing to over 3GB now, I've added a direct download link to the mods used on the server, and included directions on how to put the mods in the right spot. Whenever I update the mods on the server, I will also ensure that the download in the OP is also updated.

What's funny is though, the same EXACT motherboard that's giving me problems (one of), I ran an RX 580 perfectly fine with my Ryzen 3600 rig before I got my 5700XT. That same B450 is paired with my friend's Ryzen 1600AF, and....yeah random disconnects. I'm having other random issues with other builds here, but that is either my own mis-doings, or simple incompatibilities or busted parts. This one issue is really leaving me scratching my head here.