pio

Might see a few less blue checkmarks. Cool. I don't support greedy practices, but I don't support all the stupid blue checkmarks thinking they're the only voices because of that checkmark either. This one's kind of hard to comment on, because I dislike both. -_-

I will send all of my good vibes your way Jan! Get better!

Same here. It absolutely is amazing for performance, and a waterblock on it would certainly be interesting to see results from.

I'm still super happy for you mate, the performance seems obviously top tier. I do have to disagree on the price argument you made though. Flagship GPU's aren't supposed to continuously get more expensive every release, they're supposed to get CHEAPER on the previous generation while the latest and greatest is priced the same as last year's. That's how it always used to be. Nvidia and Intel have both been guilty of ramping up those premium brackets for a decade now, and its gotten to the point its sickening to a lot of people. AMD of course is just as complacent, but they're "usually" lesser priced than the competitors. That being said, you paid the "early adopter's tax". You're aware of that. That's fine. I did the same with my 6900XT. It happens. I'll probably do the same when the 7900XT releases assuming no 12VHPWR connector on those (unknown yet). The power connector thing, well I reamed that enough in the news article thread. It is what it is. So long as YOUR card isn't having those issues, then I'm happy for you. And yeah, with your display, I can absolutely see why you'd have made the jump. I'd pay the premium for 5120x1440 @ 120Hz as well since a 3090Ti won't cut it for me either. If you're happy at 4k resolution with that card, it just makes me even more stoked for my own upgrade eventually from the 6900XT. Again, glad you've got your hands on one and that you're enjoying the heck out of it!

I'm not saying that the 8pin and 6pin cables of past aren't subject to failure. But let's be honest here for a moment, a HUGE portion of those failures were user error. This new 12pin connector is so incredibly fragile you literally cannot bend it for 35mm. This means you cannot horizontally mount ANY GPU's that require this connector, they absolutely must be vertically mounted. So, what's going to happen when people that do NOT have vertical mount cases get their hands on these cards? I've abused the snot out of most of my cables, not even going to lie about that. And I've only caused a fire twice and it was by complete accident, and usually not even the cable at fault but a problem with load distribution or something else. Seriously, somebody send me a 4090, and I can almost guarantee you I'll find a way to burn it to the ground in a week or less, without even really doing anything outside of the norm. That is NOT okay. You're right that its fine if you know the limitations. And to be honest, it'd probably be just fine for lower wattage cards. Maybe power supply manufacturers will step in with "fixed" cables soon or something? Hard to say. But so far, this is turning out to be a big problem. The GPU is solid, but their push to go with this new stupid plug instead of using the tried and true 8pins is astonishing.

Sigh, I hate being right. -_- I knew that new 12 pin connector was a bad idea from the get go. Oh no, it'll be fine.....yeah, uh huh...... What's worse is that as was mentioned earlier, the change was done for the sake of change alone and not out of necessity. There's no reason they couldn't have used 8pin connectors and spread that gigantic load out a little further. So what if you have to use 32 pins in total to connect your GPU? All of those extra wires are a necessity in grounding, in wire gauge, and in connector quantity. On 4x 8pin if one ground or +12v wire has a bad connection somewhere, its not that big of a deal. It is, but its not. On these new 12pin connectors, if one wire or connection point has ANY sort of a problem at all.....poof. Carrying twice the amount of power through half the wiring is never a good idea in DC power.

Well, I'm at I think 7.3m pixels and you're at 8.2m pixels. So 4k resolution would be the closest standard 16:9 to my own. I'm not standard 1440p, its doubled being Ultrawide. Whatever you get at 4k resolution, I should expect ever so slightly better performance (slightly) at my own native resolution.

Nice that you're enjoying your new toy! Its certainly not my cup of tea for $1600, I play mostly racing games. For $1600, I'll just go buy a whole car..... That said, not going to lie, I want one. Unfortunately due to my projects decisions, I'll have to wait for AMD's counter offer and see what that entails. I still don't think I'll be spending $1600 though, even the $900 I paid for my 6900XT was a huge stretch considering my last "high end" card was $300. If pricing was more like it used to be, where anybody that wanted one could afford to buy one.....I'd probably be more inclined to have a wider variety of cards. Would love to have one of every Nvidia high end cards too. Sigh. -_- So question: How do you think this generation of GPU's would handle 5120x1440 @ 120Hz? (On current generation titles of course.) There's been several titles that still frustrate me with my 6900XT. Cyberpunk, Crysis Remastered, RDR2, even my favorite Beamng.drive can't run FULLY maxed. I feel like for that kind of money, we should be capable of maxing out games.

Hoping for prices on the 7700x, AM5 board, and DDR5 RAM to be somewhere in the realm of "reasonable" by Christmas. Current pricing is absolutely gross, not even remotely interested when its a $900 upgrade just for those 3 parts (3x higher than it used to be). It really wasn't that long ago you could get a good RAM kit for $50 ish, board for $100, and a good mid range CPU for around $150. I know that's unreasonable wishful thinking today, but somewhere between that and $900 would be appreciated. The 7700 65w does look interesting. I'll wait till some people like us get their hands on them to say for sure. I'd think the 7700X would likely perform much much better. But....if its like the Ryzen 3600 vs the 3600x, then it very well could be a huge winner. I was happy to take the 100MHz PBO loss on my 3600.

Shouldn't be? I hadn't touched it since I quit folding a few months ago on it. Just fired it right back up. It's possible its stuck with updates or something too, I'll check on it later this evening.

Got my 290x going again. Hopefully stats show that? I think its going just for the team competition thing.

Congrats you two!

I could run another Socket 939 (another Opteron at 2.7GHz). Otherwise, I'm kinda out of old rigs till I get the rest of the needed parts in and get my AGP cards repaired.

You never did add my T-Bird run to the leaderboards.

I gave up because I was beaten on slowest CPU. -_- Eventually I'll get my K6 running though, then the gloves come off.

Yeah, the same thing with the problems I was having with "black screens". It was nothing game breaking. It was more of a pain in the butt figuring out it was a driver problem than it was actually dealing with it and correcting it by trying out a newer beta driver. My problem is solved now on 22.10.1's and I no longer have any "driver problems" to report. Just do not use 22.5.1's on current gen cards with freesync, HDR, and a high res display, instead try 22.9.1's or newer. I still find it incredibly odd that my RX 580 didn't have the problem on 22.5.1's, but my 5700XT and 6900XT both did, knowing my 5700XT was perfectly fine before I updated it. But....not to defend AMD by any means, this applies to all 3 GPU manufacturers (now), its got to be difficult getting software to work correctly with a wide variety of hardware.

AMD's claiming double performance with RDNA3. Nvidia: "Hold my beer" This is quite troubling for us enthusiasts. I understand that we're at the limitations of current fab processes, but this is absolutely pants on head stupid. Couldn't we perhaps look at something like still producing solid GPU's but maybe put the RTX stuff on separate RTX cards for people that want RT? That's what the original plan was with PhysX, but fab processes allowed it to be integrated. Clearly.........that's not the case today with RT. It'd allow us to have better GPU's in current power envelopes, and it'd allow you to upgrade your RT performance independently from your GPU performance. I like where AMD is going with their chiplet design way better than this. Idk, just my own random thoughts on the subject.

I see your Halo Intinite music, and I raise you Halo CE music!

I need to get me some better music. I'll listen to the above one tomorrow. Doesn't look like my style, but I'm kinda getting tired of listening to the same 90's electronica / pop and 90's and older rock I've listened to for 30 years now. Maybe I'll look up some classical stuff tomorrow too. For now (thx for bumping the thread, I forgot about it and I like differing music)......I'd like to leave everyone with this one. Very interesting story if you read into the making of this song. It was made in the 90's to be a "coming down" song for the 90's raves, supposedly to help people drive home safely and would be played at the end of the night. Fun random fact, I used to listen to it as a child when I'd have headaches and it'd make my headache go away. Not even joking. I just thought that was interesting and perhaps suiting into the theme of the thread too? Probably a better song than the rebassed junk I listed earlier.......

For things like feet or anything else like that, don't forget you can always go visit a hardware store too if you already happen to have basic tools on hand. It's amazing the kinds of things you can pickup at a hardware store and just simply drill a hole in, or stuff some glue on to make it work. Doesn't hurt to go looking. Especially if you're looking at little bits of rubber that cost way too much. You can probably grab furniture feet at the hardware store for like $5 that'd stick on and do the job fine. Just an idea.

I use the P12's a bunch personally. Absolutely love those fans for their price / performance. Good static pressure on them too, so they should do a fine job on a radiator. I've got mine on AIO rads. For the rest, IDK because I haven't done water cooling since like 2009 or so.

A cardboard box works just the same too, or a piece of wood if you're really cooking things. I'll worry about getting proper bench setups done after I'm done with my projects. This comp was just something I was dragged into, kicking and screaming. Just like I was absolutely forced, with my arms being twisted behind my back to buy parts to torture..... Nah seriously though, like I said from the beginning, I was in it for the fun. My actual projects are more meaningful to me right at the moment, but once those are done, there's nothing stopping me from going ham on a proper test bench later. It's not like I don't have shelves of parts just laying around to play with. I might eventually want to buy some new boards and CPU's and junk, so I have "spares" of the good stuff in my builds. But again....that can all come later anyway. Prices of used gear USUALLY just gets cheaper and cheaper anyway, so I'm not in any hurry to go buying more AM3 boards, 939 boards, or even Intel boards to thinker with. Heck, maybe those will come in slowly over time with more competitions anyway. I had fun. I learned and relearned some stuff. I got some old gear nice and toasty. Borked a few Windows installs. Definitely burned some copper..... Good times......good times.

I'm actually quite proud that I subbed every sub for AMD CPU and GPU. I did a couple memory runs too since I could. It wasn't much compared to real competitors, but I tortured the snot out of what I could with the equipment I had on hand. Hey, I at least made it SLIGHTLY more difficult for the leaders, and that's what counts. Gotta give the leaders a good run for their time and money. Besides that, I had a blast torturing equipment again like I used to just for fun. I definitely don't like taking apart full systems that I already had going....that part sucked. I think I have 2 systems now with corrupt Windows installs that I'll eventually have to correct, but whatever. Hopefully next time I join the comps I'll have a little more just "spare" stuff laying around so I don't have to swap CPU's out of a working 20 year old build.

My score's still better. I do hate that you managed 4.3GHz though. You do know I'm going to yell at you next time I see you in the discord voice channel. Honestly, that's really REALLY not bad at all though. 1.153 FPS on a multi only drunken OC. I got 1.159 FPS after spending 2 days trying to tweak the FSB, RAM, and CPU-NB, and trying my HARDEST to just eek out 4250MHz because it kept BSOD'ing that high. Respect on the score..... EDIT: Apparently I got a 1.165 FPS. When the heck did that happen?

Okay, AMD made a liar out of my earlier post. Apparently 22.5.1's (WHQL's for my later cards) do in fact have a bug I was experiencing. I was having black screen problems on my 6900XT, which caused me to RMA the stupid thing. Read the description in the drivers, and it was a known problem. -_- It's been fixed as of 22.9.1 beta's, and I traditionally have been sticking with WHQL's. I'm on 22.10.1's now (beta's), and the problem is fixed on my 5700XT.....it wasn't a problem on my 5700XT with 22.3.1's that I had previously, it only just started happening when I updated because I was using the system again. It was a minor bug, very annoying, but still a bug. What's odd, my RX 580 did NOT have the same problem on the same drivers. So its not necessarily a 100% driver problem. But yeah. I'll still take the occasional odd issue like that over Nvidia killing GPU's with fire like the G92 and GTX 980 bugged drivers though. Lesson learned: if you DO happen to experience issues and you're leaning towards a "driver problem", read what AMD themselves say in the description of the drivers. They might have already addressed the issue in a later beta update. -_-